Categories
Press Releases

Biodiversity protection critical to address the climate crisis

Biodiversity protection critical to address the climate crisis

Quezon City—Biodiversity protection is a major weapon against climate change, advocates said during the first episode of youth-led climate webcast Stories for Better Reality entitled “Biodiversity and Climate Change: Anong Konek?”

Stories for a Better Reality is a collaboration between the Climate Change Commission and The Climate Reality Project Philippines Youth Cluster with support from the Department of Education, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), the National Youth Commission; and youth groups Kids for Kids and Wavefarers.

 In observance of the International Day for Biological Diversity, the inaugural episode centered on the importance of protecting and restoring our biodiversity and its role in climate change adaptation and mitigation.

Protecting the Earth’s land and water forms

“The more species we protect, the better natural spaces we have, the more climate-resilient we get,” Jamie Dichaves, the Campaign Lead of 30×30 Southeast Asia Coalition, said.

The 30×30 Coalition is a group that is pushing governments in Southeast Asia to join the High Ambition Coalition (HAC) for Nature and People, an intergovernmental group that champions the protection of 30% of the Earth’s land and ocean by 2030 to help slow the alarming loss of biodiversity and fight the global climate crisis.

Dichaves noted that the Philippines recorded 15.4% of land and 1.42% of marine waters under protected areas. She said that the country needs more land and water protected given the overwhelming scientific and economic data that protecting 30% globally would (1) reduce the extinction risk of nearly 9 out of 10 threatened terrestrial species, (2) support 30 million jobs and adding 650,000 more, (3) add USD500 billion to gross domestic product (GDP) in ecotourism and sustainable fisheries, and (4) push for inclusion and leadership of indigenous people and local communities (IPLCs).

Abigail Kitma, an Ibaloy-Igorot from Baguio City, highlighted the need to include IPLCs in biodiversity management planning and policymaking, noting that their traditional knowledge is vital in protecting wildlife and resources.

Kitma, who is also currently the Chairperson of the UN Youth Advisory Board, pointed out that the indigenous practices and culture are reflective of nature; thus, revealing a template of answers and solutions to various climate and environmental problems.

Protecting biodiversity also helps in disaster risk reduction and management. “During the Typhoon Odette, the ones with fewer human casualties are places with an intact natural ecosystem. One with thicker forests and with intact mangrove systems,” Dichaves recalled. 

The impacts of climate change on biodiversity

While biodiversity plays a huge role in climate change adaptation and mitigation, it bears the brunt of climate change impacts. 

For one, Dichaves mentioned how the rising sea level disturbs the nesting and hatching season of marine turtles and how the rising global temperature disrupts their species population. 

“Their sex is determined by the incubation temperature. The warmer the temperature, the more female [turtles] are hatched. Dahil napupunta sa summer yung nesting and hatching season, mas mainit yung incubation, more yung female marine turtle population. So paano magkakaroon ng mas marami pang pawikan in the future, kung konti na lang yung mga male na pwede sila makipagmate,” Dichaves explained while pointing that the nesting season shifted to months of October to November and the hatching period to June or July.

Marine turtles nest their eggs on the same beach they were previously hatched. “Noon, yung temperature at sea level ay sakto pa para makasurvive sila. Pero now, wala nang assurance kasi tumaas na yung level ng tubig, pwedeng ma-washout yung eggs,” she further explained. 

Kitma, on the other hand, shared that prolonged drought lessens irrigation affecting the soil biodiversity, which pushes farming communities to utilize hybrid varieties and more agricultural input resulting in reduced soil quality. 

“This makes the land less feasible for the original species that were planted there,” she added. 

Anson Tagtag, the Officer-in-Charge Division Chief of Caves and Wetlands and Other Ecosystems Division of the DENR Biodiversity Management Bureau, also shared the adverse effects of drought on amphibians, especially those inhabiting the forests. 

“Prolonged drought makes forests vulnerable to fire. This affects not only the forest covers, pati yung mga animals na naninirahan dun,” Tagtag said.

Priorities for the next administration in terms of biodiversity protection

When it comes to what the next administration should prioritize in terms of biodiversity protection, Kitma noted that it should consider passing legislation critical to the conservation of natural resources and the protection of its stewards. 

These critical bills, Kitma said, include National Land Use Act, institutionalizing a just and ethical plan of using the country’s land and water resources; Sustainable Forest Management Act, ensuring the sustainability of Philippine forests for the next generation; Indigenous Communities Conserved Territories and Areas Bill, promoting the rights of IPLCs in conserving and caring for the biodiversity within their ancestral domains; and Alternative Minerals Management Bill, protecting the environment and promotes the welfare of people with alternative minerals regime.

For Tagtag, the next administration must also strengthen the Wildlife Resources Conservation and Protection Act to abate the increasing illegal trade of wildlife in the country. He said the government must also enact a National Wetland Policy to clarify action points on swamps, marshes, fens, and estuaries, among others. “Ang tingin kasi natin sa wetlands ay wasteland. Hindi sila nire-recognize as special ecosystem. Pero importante sila lalo na sa disaster risk reduction initiatives lalo na sa usapin ng flooding,” he said.

For Dichaves, the next administration must pass pending bills on shark conservation, regulation of single-use plastics, and extended producer responsibility.

She also emphasized that the country needs a whole-of-society approach to effectively manage and secure biodiversity and sustain a healthy ecosystem.

“As long as the government listens to the collaborative efforts that the different groups are putting out, then it will be okay,” Dichaves said. 

Tagtag agreed, saying that the government shall closely work with local government units (LGUs) to harmonize and streamline environmental projects. He noted that with the imminent implementation of the Mandanas ruling, LGUs will gain more financial capability to account for more responsibilities in managing their resources, including the environment.

“DENR, DA (Department of Agriculture), DILG (Department of the Interior and Local Government) are joining discussions to formulate joint policies on cross-cutting concerns that affect the environment, agriculture, and local development planning process,” Tagtag added. 

***

Categories
Eleventh Hour at the Manila Bulletin

Eleventh Hour: Philippine biodiversity at a crossroads

Eleventh Hour: Philippine biodiversity at a crossroads

By Keith Cari-an

I

The Philippines, one of the megadiverse countries on the planet, is at a crossroads.

 

With new leaders poised to assume leadership in the coming weeks, the state of our endemic biodiversity and ecosystems lies in wait as the new decision-makers detail their plans for the Philippines.

On May 22, we celebrated the International Day for Biological Diversity. This year’s observance calls on “Building a shared future for all life.” Biodiversity Day 2022’s pressing call for inclusivity and proactivity needs to share the spotlight along with the priorities of this new administration.

On multiple occasions, many of us may have heard about the Philippines being one of the 17 megadiverse countries on earth. Megadiverse countries are home to the highest concentration of endemic species both above land and below water. In fact, three of these countries are in Southeast Asia. The Philippines, together with our neighbors Malaysia and Indonesia are considered biodiversity-rich.

Ironically, only Cambodia has signed on as a member of the High Ambition Coalition (HAC) for Nature and People in the region. The HAC is an intergovernmental group that champions the protection of 30 percent of the earth’s land and ocean by 2030. This goal is the third target of the draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, a proposal by the Convention on Biological Diversity working group, which provides 21 action-oriented targets that will put biodiversity on a path to recovery by 2030 for the ultimate benefit of the planet and people.

Also known as 30×30, this global initiative captured the commitment of over 90 countries to become members of the HAC. With the commitment comes opportunities to access funding to implement biodiversity-centered programs, including the empowerment of indigenous peoples and local communities who are at the frontline of local conservation measures.

The challenge for our new leaders this time is to take a stand. Not just on paper, but in its succeeding programs centered on the environment and its stakeholders.

Turning over a new leaf for the Philippines

Our archipelagic country hugely benefits from the ecosystem services our environment provides. From the resources we harvest for food and goods, climate and disease regulation to culture, education, and recreation, we owe a lot to nature and biodiversity.

The Philippine economy, especially the tourism industry, has been gradually recovering from huge losses brought by the pandemic and destructive typhoons over the past two years. Throughout the pandemic, we’ve come to witness how nature began to “heal itself” as global tourism operations halted along with destructive practices that came with it. The easing of quarantine guidelines prompted several organizations and companies to invest in sustainability as the tourism industry bit by bit recharges to accommodate restless tourists caged by the travel restrictions.

Our indigenous peoples have been at a disadvantage in keeping and managing their ancestral domains for several years. Indigenous peoples, along with local communities, have been subject to exploitation and human rights violations, as reported by media and human rights groups. These same citizens lead local conservation efforts as they acknowledge the importance of nature to their cultural identity, livelihood, and much more.

This year’s Biodiversity Day emphasized the importance of sharing a progressive future for all. In the Philippines, the new leaders must take our indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLCs) by the hand toward an inclusive tomorrow. One crucial way is for the leaders to ensure that the implementation of programs will not only protect and conserve our unique ecosystems but also lift IPLCs whose lives are at stake in this ecological crisis.

30×30 in Southeast Asia

Our leaders are at the tipping point of this narrative too.

The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) has notably aligned with the science supporting the 30×30 goals, as well as standing firm on ensuring the explicit reference to the rights of IPLCs during the recent set of negotiations held in Geneva, Switzerland last March. Campaign for Nature, the leading organization in promoting 30×30 and HAC membership, commended the Philippines and DENR for these affirmative positions.

The 30×30 Southeast Asia Coalition has taken root and signed on more than 200 individual and organization members in the Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia.

Led by the Centre for Sustainability PH, Kids for Kids, and Youth Engaged in Wetlands, the 30×30 SEA Coalition tirelessly lobbies for the national governments of these megadiverse countries to join the HAC.

Should the Philippines finally join the HAC, this decision will definitely become a catalyst for other ASEAN member-states to sign in, creating a domino effect.

The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) has notably aligned with the science supporting the 30×30 goals, as well as standing firm on ensuring the explicit reference to the rights of IPLCs during the recent set of negotiations held in Geneva, Switzerland last March. Campaign for Nature, the leading organization in promoting 30×30 and HAC membership, commended the Philippines and DENR for these affirmative positions.

The 30×30 Southeast Asia Coalition has taken root and signed on more than 200 individual and organization members in the Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia.

Led by the Centre for Sustainability PH, Kids for Kids, and Youth Engaged in Wetlands, the 30×30 SEA Coalition tirelessly lobbies for the national governments of these megadiverse countries to join the HAC.

The 30×30 SEA Coalition is calling on more individuals, institutions, and organizations to take part in amplifying this global movement into the corners of the region.

The coalition is not just exclusive to those that solely focus on climate action and environment conservation and protection. All groups and individuals from different sectors are welcome to learn about and ultimately join the 30×30 global campaign.

Local governments can also play a big part in making waves by working closely with IPLCs and biodiversity-conservation organizations in passing policies at the municipal and provincial levels.

The Philippines is at a critical moment. Our country committing to 30×30 and joining the HAC is just the first step. Beyond that, our next set of leaders must ensure that biodiversity protection programs are people-centered and science-based.

***

 

 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
 
Keith Brandon Cari-an is the communications manager of the 30×30 Southeast Asia Coalition, a multi-sectoral coalition in the ASEAN region calling on our governmental bodies and those in authority to sign on to the High Ambition Coalition (HAC) for Nature and People in order to protect 30% of our natural land and water forms by 2030.
 
The Climate Reality Project Philippines is a member of the 30×30 Southeast Asia Coalition. For inquiries about the Coalition, contact Keith at keith@centreforsustainabilityph.org. 
 

ABOUT ELEVENTH HOUR

This article was originally published on The Climate Reality Project Philippines’ weekly column for the Manila Bulletin called Eleventh Hour.

This column serves a digital space to discuss our organization’s work on supporting the country’s just transition into a clean, affordable, and self-sufficient energy system; advancing sustainable urban mobility to highlight the issues of equity and democracy; and raising public awareness about the need to phase out single-use plastics. It also serves as a platform for Pinoy Climate Reality Leaders to share your stories, promote your climate initiatives, and provide critical insights to issues that matter to climate action, environmental protection, and sustainable development.

Categories
Press Releases

Advocates: Ocean is an important ally in the fight against climate change

Advocates: Ocean is an important ally in the fight against climate change

Quezon City—The ocean is humankind’s biggest ally in its combat against climate change. This was emphasized by marine conservation advocates during the 29th episode of The Climate Reality Project Philippines’ Klimatotohanan webcast series entitled “Be the Change You Want to Sea: Pinoy Climate Reality Leaders Making Waves for Marine Conservation.”

The special Month of the Ocean episode featured Pinoy Climate Reality Leaders* who are spearheading initiatives on marine resource management, environmental stewardship, and ocean sustainability in response to the worsening impacts of the climate crisis.

Frances Camille Rivera, Co-founder and Director of Oceanus Conservation, noted that the ocean absorbs about 26 percent of the carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere, making it a powerful agent for climate change mitigation.

“Currently, carbon dioxide concentration in our atmosphere is around 417 parts per million. If the ocean is not doing its job as a carbon sink, the concentration in our atmosphere will shoot up to 600 [parts per million]. Imagine how worse the impacts could get,” Harvey Perello, Project Manager of non-profit organization Save Philippine Sea, noted during the webcast. “The ocean has that power. We just need to support it and protect it,” he added.

Increasing ocean literacy through environmental education and campaigns

Acknowledging the need to inform Filipinos about their crucial role as ocean stewards, Perello said that marine conservation literacy is at the heart of Save Philippine Sea’s climate change communication efforts.

Perello shared about Earthducation, a program that provides teaching kits to formal (academe) and informal educators (development sector) on ocean pollution, among many other topics on the environment and climate change.

Rivera agreed with Perello and mentioned that the existing local education system lacks focus on teaching the importance of marine life to humankind. She shared that this prompted her to develop storybooks and organize storytelling events aiming to raise marine conservation awareness among students.

Fel Cesar Cadiz, Director for Learning and Behavior Adoption of RARE Philippines, highlighted the need for public participation that shall emanate from the coastal and fishing communities that are “often overlooked and under-resourced.”

As local waters become more vulnerable to overfishing and destructive practices, Cadiz shared four (4) core fishing behaviors to address overfishing in the Philippines: (1) to register fishers; (2) to record fish catch; (3) to respect fisheries regulation; and (4) to participate in fishery management.

Laws and policies on marine conservation

Cadiz said that the Philippines has good laws in place that touch on marine conservation and protection. This includes the National Integrated Protected Areas System Act, which protects biodiversity-rich areas in the country; Ecological Solid Waste Management Act, which helps manage threats to biodiversity, specifically waste; and the Local Government Code, which provides local government units the independence to manage their resources, especially the water and the terrestrial.

However, while there is a need for more laws targeted at specific marine conservation issues to complement existing laws, Perello noted that the biggest gap at the moment is the implementation of existing laws.

“That’s (implementation) where we always lack. For example, the [Ecological] Solid Waste Management Act. It has been there for quite some time. Yet, we still struggle to segregate. We still struggle to recycle,” Perello noted, saying that the government must take a more systemic approach to see what laws must be changed and what must be fully implemented and to find solutions on how to make the laws more effective.

Rivera also agreed, saying that existing marine-related laws and policies lack enforcement. In her example, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR), despite their mandate, failed to regularly update the list of underutilized productive fishponds that could be reverted to mangrove forests.

On whether marine resource management is currently integrated into the government’s climate change action plan, Cadiz explained that the case is different for different local government units. He noted that while there are local governments that understand the need for a holistic approach to development, there are those that do not have the capacity to streamline their Comprehensive Land Use Plans and Local Climate Change Action Plans (LCCAPs).

Cadiz also noted that the Climate Change Act of 2009 mandates local government units to develop LCCAPs.

“Unfortunately, the process itself is costly. Not all local government units, especially fourth-class and fifth-class municipalities, are able to gather all information to feed into the LCCAP formulation,” he explained. “It’s expensive. It takes a lot of process. But they have to start somewhere. They don’t have to finish the plan immediately, maybe invest on researches, and eventually they can come up with the plan,” he added.

What the incoming administration should prioritize in terms of marine protection

Asked about the policies and programs that the upcoming administration should prioritize, Rivera explained that there is no one-size-fits-all solution.

“It’s a lot of collaborations. Everything is multi-sectoral. The next administration has to listen to all ears, listen to all aspects of creating projects, in making sure that they are balanced with the environment, balanced with people,” Rivera said.

Cadiz, meanwhile, noted that there is no need for the next administration to start from scratch. “There are actually excellent programs from the government. Continue those, learn from the mistakes, and enhance,” he said.

Cadiz also shared that RARE, along with other organizations, will continue to push for the establishment of the Department of Fisheries.

“In Southeast Asia, we are the only country that does not have a full department for fisheries, not just a bureau. We know that when it’s just a bureau within a bigger department, there is lack of resources and manpower. Since we rely a lot on our seas, it is high time that we give focus to creating a Department of Fisheries” he said.

For Perello, the next administration must look at how the country could transition into a greener economy. “The solutions are there. They are already available. The science is established. At the same time, from the economic and social standpoints, the question is how can we make sure that the people are not left behind as the country progresses,” he noted.

 

***

Categories
Press Releases

Youth-led policy review calls for a national ban on SUPs; cites best plastic management practices from Marikina, Makati, and QC

Youth-led policy review calls for a national ban on SUPs; cites best plastic management practices from Marikina, Makati, and QC

Quezon City—There is a dire need for the enactment of House Bill (HB) No. 9147 or the Single-use Plastic Products Regulation Act on account of the grave impacts of plastic pollution in the country, according to a policy note recently released by a group of AB Development Studies students at the Ateneo De Manila University and The Climate Reality Project Philippines.

The policy note is part of  “Mag-ASUP Tayo”, an advocacy project of the Climate’s Eight from Ateneo and the Youth Cluster of Climate Reality Philippines on anti-single-use plastics (ASUP) policies and practices. Its findings and recommendations were presented during the 28th episode of Climate Reality Philippines’ Klimatotohanan webcast series. 

The policy review evaluated the local government units (LGUs) of Marikina City, Makati City, and Quezon City according to the impact, efficiency, and consistencies of their existing plastic waste management policies. 

Streamlining the definitions of and imposing a ban on SUPs

“All the interviewed LGU representatives expressed their  support for the passing of HB No. 9147 or the Single-Use Plastic Products Regulation Act,” Ryan Opinion, Head of the Climate’s Eight Policy Note Team, shared.

The HB No. 9147 provides for the gradual phase-out of single-use plastics, which it defines as “plastic products designed to be disposed of, destroyed, or recycled, after only one use.”

Opinion said that the passage of HB No. 9147 would operationalize a national definition of single-use plastics in the country and enable LGUs to act in a streamlined and coordinated manner.

In the absence of a law that will ban single-use plastics, Opinion said that the policy note highlighted the need for the National Solid Waste Management Commission (NSWMC) to issue and promulgate the Non-Environmentally Acceptable Products (NEAP) list, as mandated by Republic Act No. 9003 or the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act.

The NEAP list, which has been overdue for over two (2) decades, would identify and eventually ban products that are deemed harmful to the environment.

Scaling up of best practices on SUP management

The policy note discussed best practices from target LGUs that could be adopted by other LGUs to improve their own plastic waste management and reduction systems.

For one, it credited consumer-targeted campaigns for effectively evoking behavior changes in plastic consumption among the LGU’s constituents.

“Consumer-targeted campaigns are effective as supporting programs for ordinances that target establishments. Such programs should aim at incentivizing consumers and targeting behavioral change,” Opinion said.

The policy note cited Makati City’s “Recyclable Mo, Palit Grocery Ko” for encouraging more citizens to collect recyclable wastes in exchange for grocery items. Likewise, it cited Quezon City’s “Trash to Cashback” campaign for allowing consumers to trade their single-use plastics for environmental points. Marikina City, on the other introduced the “Bring Your Own Bag” information campaign, which provided incentives and prizes for citizens in public markets who bring their own reusable bags. Altogether, these incentive-based strategies and information campaigns complemented the ASUP policies of respective cities contributing to the decrease in the recorded volume of plastic waste they sent to landfills.

The formation of committees to inspect ASUP regulations, according to the policy review, was also effective. For instance, the City of Makati Plastic Monitoring Task Force provided worthwhile assistance in the implementation of the city’s ASUP policies as they were dedicated to monitoring the compliance of establishments and enforcing the provisions.

The policy note highlighted that ordinances that focus on regulating not the exact type of plastic being used but the intention and use of plastic help prevent loopholes and leeways on the part of establishments and distributors. This was the case for Marikina, which resulted in more than 5,000 kilograms of recyclables, and dramatic improvement in flood control due to removal of plastics in drainage systems.

The policy note also noted that having a uniform SUP definition is an effective takeoff point to reinforce the implementation of policy waste management policies. This is institutionalized in Quezon City’s Ordinance No. SP-2876 which distinguished plastics according to their use and ruled out harmful substitutes. This would prevent loopholes in regulations and standardize operations. 

Policy recommendations at the local level

The policy note also included recommendations directed at improving current LGU policies and enabling better ASUP implementation.

These recommendations include the following: (1) LGUs must regularly update their Waste Analysis & Characterization Studies (WACS) and must make them accessible on online platforms; (2) Plastic waste management ordinances should  also have specific target metrics along with specific succeeding transitory stages of phasing out plastic in the future; (3) Initiate studies of supply and usage trends on plastic alternatives among constituencies to incentivize industries and enterprises to use alternatives; (4) Establish greater partnerships with micro, small, and medium enterprises and non-governmental organizations that help promote the zero-waste lifestyle and circular economy through initiatives, such as upcycling of plastic waste, refilling stores, and plastic-free deliveries and shopping; and (5) Create local resource banks with all plastic waste management guidelines and ordinances presented in a clear and concise manner for establishments and retailers to address queries and concerns. 

“We do have a right and responsibility to hold our LGUs and government agencies accountable for the honest fulfillment of ASUP and proper waste management,” Kat Llorente, a member of the Climate’s Eight Team said.

Policy recommendations for the national government

Trisha Cruz, also a member of the Climate’s Eight Team, noted that there is a need to shift the focus of finding more sustainable solutions from consumers to producers and regulators.

“The pressure for sustainable solutions is always dumped on the consumers. And what makes that even more difficult is this “pressure” is not productive. There won’t be that much progress because a lot of these consumers don’t have the means to shift to eco-friendly products and practices, even if they wanted to,” Cruz said.

This is why one of the policy note’s recommendations to the national government is to “fund the research and development of viable plastic alternatives for plastic dependent industries and swiftly begin the overall process of integrating their use in our economy.”

A review of LGU plastic waste management policies, according to the policy analysis, must also be conducted by the national government to provide feedback and recommendations, best practices, and points of convergence.

Moreover, the policy note urged the establishment of platforms that will make available recent studies and data from the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), NSWMC, and other related departments and offices that are valuable to local planning and implementation.

In the end, Opinion noted that a system change is needed to truly fight plastic pollution and climate change.

“Our political structures and processes are really powerful and essential to solving our sustainability and climate problems. [Climate change] is an economic problem caused by plastic dependence, a political problem caused by the unwillingness of the government to enforce anti-pollution laws, and a social problem influenced by our consumerist culture,” he noted.

***

Categories
Blog Post

The case for climate action in the Philippines’ Marcos Restoration Era

The case for climate action in the Philippines’ Marcos Restoration Era

The election of Ferdinand Marcos, Jr. as president poses real questions to the future of democracy and climate action in one of the world’s most climate-vulnerable nations.

  

Thirty-six years ago, on February 25, 1986, the whole world witnessed the Philippines momentously topple the 20-year dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos through a peaceful “People Power” revolution.

This week, the son and namesake of the late dictator effectively won the presidency by a landslide, sealing the revival of a family name that is hounded by some of the most horrendous human rights violations and corruption cases ever recorded in history.

The Marcos Restoration – as a renowned Filipino historian called it – did not happen overnight. It was a result of a massive, organized, and decades-long effort to rebuild political networks and whitewash the Marcos regime in the minds of those too young to remember or witness firsthand the atrocities under the martial law era.

But the sins of the Marcos dictatorship were well-documented. Under his rule, the senior Marcos abolished Congress, shut down media outlets, used the military to torture and kill people expressing dissent, and plundered billions of dollars from state funds.

However, despite numerous court rulings[i] affirming the regime’s unlawful acts, the Marcos family has refused to publicly acknowledge their wrongdoings and has regained their popularity among Filipinos, thanks to Marcos loyalists and cronies.

They also benefited from the failure of the education system to provide a sober  recollection of martial law to younger generations. The massive disinformation campaign on social media platforms, such as Facebook, Youtube, and Tiktok –  the same playbook that catapulted Rodrigo Duterte to the presidency in 2016 –also played a huge role in the imminent return of the Marcos family to power.[ii]

THE IMPLICATIONS FOR CLIMATE ACTION

But what does this era of Marcos Restoration mean for a country among the most vulnerable to the climate crisis? What is at stake in six years of a Marcos presidency with the shadow of his late father and dictator’s crimes cast over him?

First, Ferdinand Marcos, Jr.’s efforts to promote and support the rights of climate and environmental defenders will dictate the progress of the climate movement in the country.

We’ve always believed that a vibrant democracy is key to addressing the climate crisis. But protecting the human rights of climate and environmental defenders remains a grave concern, as the Philippines was reported to be the third-deadliest country for environmental defenders in the world in 2020, according to the international watchdog Global Witness.

Ferdinand Marcos, Jr. has made it hard to assess his stance on this very important issue.

And so these questions linger in our minds: Will his administration support the Environmental Defense Bill pending in Congress? Will he end the practice of blatant red-tagging and the culture of impunity espoused by the previous administration? Will he put in place mechanisms to ensure that climate and environmental advocates are heard and consulted? Or will he use the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 to clamp down on political dissent?

Second, the new president’s success or failure in implementing climate policies will decide who survives and thrives in this country.

Hit by the tropical cyclones and other weather extremes that are becoming more frequent and destructive as global warming continues, the Philippines experiences escalating losses and damages year after year. This cycle of destruction and rehabilitation can only be addressed by deploying science and evidence-based solutions and by ensuring that the global community follows through with its commitment to limit global warming to the critical limit of 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, as enshrined in the Paris Agreement.

Global climate inaction, according to scientists, would lead to a 2.2.-3.5 degree warmer world and would result in more frequent and more intense climate impacts, such as sea-level rise, drought, water scarcity, and food insecurity.

Could Ferdinand Marcos, Jr.’s administration then streamline and fortify the country’s climate change adaptation and mitigation policies and disaster risk reduction and management efforts? Will his leadership elevate the Philippines’ position as a formidable champion of climate-vulnerable countries in this critical decade for climate and environmental action?

Lastly, the new president’s success or failure in leading the country’s transition to a renewable energy system will determine whether or not the Filipino people will finally enjoy cleaner air, healthier communities, and access to clean, reliable, and affordable electricity.

Ferdinand Marcos, Jr. may explore and accelerate renewable energy sources, and no longer use coal and other fossil fuels. All good, but his plans to incorporate nuclear power into the country’s energy mix and to revive the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant – a project built during his father’s administration but not made operational due to issues of safety and corruption – raises concerns.

His thinking is clear: Nuclear energy will lower electricity rates in the Philippines. But given the huge cost of sustaining and building nuclear power plants in the country, it is not a cheaper alternative to fossil fuels and definitely not a viable solution to the country’s energy security issues.

Electricity rates are already high in the country due to imported fossil fuels whose prices are driven by the volatile global market. The same goes with nuclear energy as we would have to rely on imported uranium as nuclear fuel.  Moreover, we have to consider the unfathomable and dangerous risks posed by nuclear power plants to our communities, especially during times of disastrous and calamitous events. Then there’s the question of where will we store and dispose of the nuclear waste?

Funds to invest in nuclear power should rather be used in harnessing the country’s abundant renewable energy sources, specifically solar and wind energy, which are now more proven to be more economical to build.

Furthermore, a landmark report released just last week by the Philippine Commission on Human Rights stated that the world’s carbon majors (aka largest fossil fuel producers) engaged in willful obfuscation of climate science. Its specific recommendations to the Philippine government include implementing a coal moratorium and spearheading the transition to a renewable energy system.

Will Ferdinand Marcos, Jr. uphold the findings of this report and prioritize the development of renewable energy? Will he actually listen to science and economists and steer the country away from nuclear energy?

The answers to these questions shall be the barometer by which the Marcos Administration will be measured in terms of climate and environmental governance.

NAVIGATING THE NEXT SIX YEARS

In line with this, The Climate Reality Project Philippines vows to remain vigilant as it navigates a new era of Philippine democracy.

The current political climate will make our work on elevating climate discourse and pushing for climate solutions twice as hard. Challenging times are ahead. Nevertheless, we are ready to demand greater accountability and transparency from the government.

We will remain steadfast on our call for the next administration to prioritize the development of a comprehensive roadmap for implementing the country’s first nationally determined contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement – a plan that should spell out detailed projects and timetables, as well as financing for the transition to a low-carbon economy.

To address the country’s medium and long-term adaptation needs, we will also continue to push for the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) spearheaded by the Climate Change Commission (CCC). This involves ensuring the completion of the updating process for the existing National Climate Change Action Plan (NCCAP).

Moreover, our fight to eliminate single-use plastics in our communities and to democratize our streets with renewable and active modes of mobility will continue. With or without support from government.

Moving forward, we will intensify our contributions to the growing efforts to fight fake news online. We intend to strengthen partnerships and forge new ones with the media, the academy, and other organizations to ramp up efforts against disinformation.

With the Anti-Terror Law still in effect, we will also strive to find a safe space and path to continuously support the initiatives of more than 1,800 Climate Reality Leader activists in the country.

The strength of our organization lies in the unwavering passion and commitment of our community of  Climate Reality Leaders. The same spirit will sustain our advocacy in the coming years.

To this end, we also call on the other branches of Climate Reality to work closely with us in advancing scalable and replicable climate solutions and in battling disinformation systems that are threatening democracy not just in the Philippines but across the globe.

***

NOTES
[i]  In 2003, the Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled that over 25 billion pesos worth of Marcos assets were ill-gotten wealth—a decision that concluded a near two-decade legal struggle between the government and the Marcos family over the custody of assets kept in various Swiss bank accounts.

In 2018, anti-graft court Sandiganbayan convicted the family matriarch Imelda Marcos of seven counts of graft related to financial dealings with Swiss-based NGOs during her stint as government official under her husband’s rule.

At the end of 2020, the Philippine Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) released a breakdown of the P174.2 billion worth of ill-gotten wealth recovered from the Marcos family. It revealed that it is still running after P125.9 billion worth of real and personal properties—all of which are still under litigation.

In 2021, the Sandiganbayan enforced a 1992 Hawaii court decision that declared the Philippine Government the legal owner of bank certificates that the Marcoses took with them when they fled there in 1986.

[ii] Marcos, Jr. served in the Philippine Senate for six years before his unsuccessful run for Vice President in 2016 while his sister Imee, on the other hand, won a seat in the Senate in 2019.

 
Categories
Eleventh Hour at the Manila Bulletin

Eleventh Hour: The whys and hows of the plastic crisis

Eleventh Hour: The whys and hows of the plastic crisis

By Andrea Ong, Trisha Cruz, and Danielle Madriaga

I

Plastic is the inescapable material that wraps or makes up almost everything we buy—plastic utensils, balloons, shampoo bottles, even the packaging of our favorite chips. It’s highly likely that every single person has used a plastic bag, a plastic straw, plastic containers, and other forms of plastic that may be easily thrown away after use. But why is plastic everywhere? And how has it taken over our lives?

 

One word: convenience.

Plastic is easy to produce and easy to use, so there’s a high demand for it. However, in exchange for short-term convenience, plastic costs the world serious long-term effects on the health of both people and the planet.

Three things, in particular, make the problem of plastic production and consumption so complex and difficult to solve: first, how people can be unaware of plastic’s harmful consequences; second, how people can be aware but not have the ability to choose eco-friendly alternatives; and third, how people continue to choose plastic despite being aware of its harmful effects and having the ability to switch to more sustainable options.

The plastic life cycle

About 99 percent of plastics in use are actually made of petrochemicals that are derived from fossil fuels such as crude oil, which are broken down into resins to create plastic. Once plastics are manufactured, they are then sold to markets and households, after which, more often than not, they end up in our landfills or the open environment.

Unfortunately, the chemicals found in plastic make them difficult to break down and be regenerated. Thus, from the beginning, in the extraction of materials needed to manufacture it, until the end of its life cycle when it becomes a huge waste management problem, plastic poses a problem not only to our environment but to the climate as well.

Plastic waste, more likely than not, ends up in our oceans or in landfills. Plastic also poses a significant threat to people whose jobs or means to survive directly involve plastic. Waste collectors, the urban poor, and even a simple dweller living near or beside landfills or open dumps are at risk from the potential harms of plastic wastes.

Addressing the root cause of plastic pollution

While it is our individual responsibility to keep our environment healthy and free of pollution, advocates agree that governments and companies have a larger responsibility in preventing plastic waste and pollution.

Republic Act (RA) No. 9003 or the Ecological Solid Waste Management Law sets the role of government agencies and local government units in proper waste segregation, recycling, composting, and disposal. However, its provisions, such as the issuance of the list of non-environmentally acceptable products (NEAP), are yet to be promulgated today, 22 years after the law was passed.

If a tap overflows, do you tell yourself to stop using the water? Or do you turn off the faucet? In the same vein, it’s time to stop plastic pollution at the source. However, majority of the solutions available right now are temporary fixes and fail to address the root causes of plastic pollution.

As anti-single-use plastic advocates, we are also called to go beyond personal lifestyle changes and to engage others to be part of the movement.  At the end of the day, consumers shouldn’t feel bad or pressured. Instead, be reminded that the solution to the plastic crisis goes beyond living a zero-waste lifestyle. No matter how much we want to change our ways to be more environmental-friendly, it can almost seem impossible to do so when the rest of our society continues to incorporate it into our way of life.

But difficult as it seems, one should still try to adopt a more sustainable lifestyle. As activist Chuck Baclagon puts it: “It’s not a reason to stop pursuing a world that’s ecologically sustainable and just.”

Apart from finding ways to reuse plastics as individuals, we must also find ways to engage governments and corporations to improve waste management solutions and shift production systems. We must keep in mind that while recycling and upcycling are needed to manage existing waste, the real solution is to stop the tap on the endless production of plastic.

 

***

 

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

 

Andrea Ong (top left), Trisha Cruz (top right), and Polly Javier (bottom left) are members of the Climate’s Eight, a group of AB Development Studies students from the Ateneo de Manila University behind ‘Mag-ASUP Tayo!’—an anti-single-use plastic campaign in partnership with the Youth Cluster of The Climate Reality Project Philippines.
 
Danielle Madriaga (bottom right) is one of the youth coordinators of Climate Reality Philippines, head of its writers pool, and project co-lead for What’s SUP. She also belongs to the Sustainable Industries Cluster of Climate Reality Philippines, being a civil engineer and green building professional.
 

ABOUT ELEVENTH HOUR

This article was originally published on The Climate Reality Project Philippines’ weekly column for the Manila Bulletin called Eleventh Hour.

This column serves a digital space to discuss our organization’s work on supporting the country’s just transition into a clean, affordable, and self-sufficient energy system; advancing sustainable urban mobility to highlight the issues of equity and democracy; and raising public awareness about the need to phase out single-use plastics. It also serves as a platform for Pinoy Climate Reality Leaders to share your stories, promote your climate initiatives, and provide critical insights to issues that matter to climate action, environmental protection, and sustainable development.