Categories
Press Releases

People-centered Transport as climate action: SEA transport planners, advocates #MoveTogether for low-carbon and sustainable mobility

People-centered Transport as climate action: SEA transport planners, advocates #MoveTogether for low-carbon and sustainable mobility

Last May 21-23, The Climate Reality Project Philippines, in partnership with the Institute for Climate and Sustainable Cities (ICSC), gathered transport planners and representatives across Asia to discuss best practices and pertinent issues surrounding sustainable mobility in the region.

Entitled, #MOVETOGETHER: Regional Exchange and Workshop on Sustainable Urban Mobility and Placemaking in Southeast Asia, the event was supported by the Clean Mobility Collective Southeast Asia (CMC SEA), TRANSCEND (Transformative Actions for Climate and Ecological Protection and Development) Project, and the Local Government of Antipolo City.

Throughout the three-day workshop, people-centered transport and placemaking were positioned as a powerful community building and climate action strategy. Placemaking is a collaborative practice of reimagining streets and public spaces into vibrant places that prioritize community and the environment; one that directly confronts the transport sector’s glaring influence on the climate crisis.

In her opening remarks, Climate Reality Philippines Branch Manager Aimee Oliveros, emphasized this point, stressing that the transport sector remains one of the major drivers of global warming due to its significant greenhouse gas emissions. 

“Accelerating the equitable shift toward cleaner, more efficient mobility systems—through active transport, improved public transport, and electrification—has become not only an environmental priority but also an economic and resilience strategy for cities,” said Oliveros.

The workshop gathered together the winners of the 2025 Southeast Asia Mobility Awards (SEAMA) from Jakarta, Surabaya, and Semarang in Indonesia, Georgetown in Malaysia, and Quezon City and Iloilo City in the Philippines. Also in attendance are various Local Government Units (LGUs), representatives from National Government Agencies (NGAs) including the Department of Transportation (DOTr), Department of Budget and Management (DBM), and the Department of Human Settlement and Urban Development (DHSUD); as well as, transport advocates, and experts from the Clean Mobility Collective (CMC) which furthered this unique opportunity to expand regional collaboration and strengthen the growing network of mobility champions.

Winners of the 2025 Southeast Asia Mobility Awards (SEAMA) from Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines, take part in a knowledge exchange session on inclusive and people-centered mobility, day one of the workshop

Building on this, day one of the workshop focused on regional best practices on active and public transport, providing a cross-cultural space for participants to exchange real-world experiences, share policy and implementation lessons, as well as explore practical pathways toward more commuter-friendly, low-carbon, and inclusive urban mobility.

With inclusivity framed as a pre-requisite rather than an add-on, the discussions laid the groundwork for the succeeding days, which shifted to placemaking as a crucial complementary strategy for building community-centered public spaces. This carried into a Jane’s Walk, a free citizen-led walking conversation inspired by urbanist Jane Jacobs. In line with this year’s theme, “walking in STEP (Stories, Travels, Ecologies, Places), the activity was aimed at reconnecting people with their environments and communities. The same day also launched the Philippine Chapter of Women on the Move (WoTM), a collaborative space for women in Asia’s mobility sector.

“At the heart of it, our vision is pretty simple. We want cities where people can breathe clean air, move safely, and live in places where companies and decision-makers are accountable for their impact. Cities where transport systems don’t pollute or harm people and where both governments and the private sector prioritize people and the planet over profit,” said CMC SEA Coordinator, Arielle Celine Tabinga, who also works at ICSC as a Manager for Urban Development.

A paper in the sky

ICSC Board of Trustee and environmental activist Beau Baconguis aspires for safer and more sustainable roads in her welcome message

Leading the way, ICSC Board of Trustee, Beau Baconguis, set an inspirational yet urgent tone during day two of the workshop. She reminded participants how far the movement has come and how much further it must go. “Today, we know that Quezon City has now been moving in the direction that was only a dream for us three decades ago. It may have taken long, but we are slowly getting there.  Now we are hearing stories from the rest of the region and in other parts of the world that are more people and ecology-centric, more inclusive,” Baconguis stressed. 

Underscoring how urban mobility policies must account for climate change’s growing impact on transportation, Baconguis then posed the question, “are we doing enough to reverse or slow down planetary destruction? I believe we all know the answer and that is the reason for our coming together today. We are hopeful people.”

Participants were toured around selected streets in Antipolo City, as part of their placemaking and urban design improvement activities

To translate that hope into tangible action, participants visited P. Oliveros and Olalia Street in Antipolo City to ground the discussions in real-world application. The high-density streets shaped by rapid urbanization revealed firsthand how the absence of people-centered development affects safety, accessibility, and community life. Participants then brainstormed ways to improve mobility using placemaking principles, and presented their crafted ideas with Antipolo City Vice Mayor Roberto Andres “Randy” R. Puno Jr.

Drawing on these observations, participants from LGUs in the Philippines and Indonesia,  were tasked with crafting proposals to transform their existing car-centric urban sites to ones that prioritize people’s transport needs through placemaking.

After two days of learning sessions and receiving feedback from assigned coaches from the Clean Mobility Collective, the LGUs presented improved proposals to a set of judges during a pitching challenge.

From these pitches, all shaped by a growing awareness on people-centered transport to address the impacts of mobility on people and the planet, the entry from Quezon City, as represented by Architect Irene Morales, won the challenge. Their proposal to convert Bagong Daan in barangay West Kamias into a safe, inclusive community space, was awarded with USD 1000 as seed funding.

Judges expressed high hopes for the winning team’s project, encouraging other participants to pursue their proposals, amid the mounting climate and transport challenges commuters face daily.

 Quezon CIty wins the pitching challenge, taking home USD 1000 to kickstart their proposal to convert Bagong Daan to a community space

The pitching challenge was but a culmination of the participants’ learnings, following storytelling and world cafe sessions where speakers from across the region stressed important lessons and best practices that resonate on the ground.

Using placemaking as a platform for action and engagement, the sessions featured Chong Sue Yen of Commute Initiatives on transforming safer streets in Malaysia. She encouraged the participants to craft plans with the community, instead of just for them. Silpa Wairatpanij of the Thailand Walking and Cycling Institute Foundation narrated his experiences in making Thailand’s streets safe and for the people. Vũ Thục Khuyên of Think Playgrounds Social Enterprise shared how art was integrated in their campaigns in Viet Nam. Deliani Poetriayu Siregar of the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) Southeast Asia focused on improving safety and connectivity around public transport in Indonesia. Ankit Bhargava of Sensing Local spotlighted the citizen-led revitalization of public spaces in Bengaluru, and Architect Irene Morales narrated how SPARK Maginhawa project turned the Quezon City hip street into a safer public space.  

Participants and speakers alike collaborate in an activity proposing improvements in Antipolo City’s roads

“Placemaking is a really useful tool to translate policies in the sky into realities on the ground for people, so that decision makers and communities whose these decisions are actually impacted can come together,” said Chong Sue Yen, who also served as a speaker and coach during the workshop.

The muscle of the city

Across the sessions, a shared reality emerged. People-centered transport initiatives often fail due to lack of state support, minimal community engagement, or backlash when they disturb the urban design status quo.

To this, Ankit Bhargava, of Sensing Local in India, reminded LGU representatives of the need to mobilize the muscle of the city.  This includes not only residents and businesses, but also experts such as planners and engineers.

Participants learn about placemaking innovations and lessons from across Asia through stories shared by speakers from the Clean Mobility Collective during a World Cafe session, day two of the workshop

“I think the biggest lever to leverage the muscle of the city is through participation. The city has to open up what it imagines it wants to do, and then invite the public— as well as the architects and designers— to be able to contribute to that. Do large scale public facing participatory exercises, and really listen— listen deeply,” said Bhargava.

Amplifying the same sentiment from the workshop participants, Bhargava also pointed out that, workshops like #MoveTogether serve as exposure sessions that help local governments understand and adopt technical processes needed to turn people-centered mobility from aspiration to action. 

Maria Golda Hilario, ICSC’s Director for Urban Development, reminded the workshop participants that our cities share the same heartbeat of struggle and aspiration, “we acknowledge that while some move freely, many more are still left behind in the journey towards more people-centered mobility systems in our region.”

Hilario concluded, “this is where I stress that the success of inclusive urban development and mobility planning must be rooted in our inclusion of communities and their lived realities.”

***

Categories
Columns Press Releases

Climate Reality Philippines Calls for a People-Centered Energy Transition at the ASEAN for the Peoples Week 2026

Climate Reality Philippines Calls for a People-Centered Energy Transition at the ASEAN for the Peoples Week 2026

At the ASEAN for the Peoples Week 2026 in Cebu, The Climate Reality Project Philippines joined civil society organizations, policymakers, and community leaders in advancing a critical regional message; that ASEAN’s energy transition must be rooted in climate diplomacy, regional solidarity, and people-centred resilience.

Organized by the Foreign Policy Community of Indonesia (FPCI), the forum was held alongside the 48th ASEAN Summit. It was designed as a platform to strengthen civil society participation in regional decision-making amidst intensifying geopolitical tensions, fossil fuel volatility, and deepening climate risks. 

For Climate Reality Philippines, this reflects the core of its climate diplomacy work; building bridges among governments, communities, businesses, and advocates to advance ambitious, science-based, and socially just climate action. 

Across the various discussions in Cebu, one question shaped the conversations: how can ASEAN protect its people from global shocks that continue to destabilize livelihoods, energy systems, and local economies?

If the region wants to build a resilient, innovative, dynamic, and people-centered community by 2045, then its energy transition must be shaped by ASEAN centrality, binding regional mechanisms, and climate diplomacy that puts people ahead of profits.

The convening stressed that without stronger regional coordination, ASEAN economies remain vulnerable to unpredictable fossil fuel markets, external political pressures, and corporate control over energy systems. It also highlighted that the West Asia oil situation can be felt more closely by people on the ground— rising fuel prices affect national supply chains, stressing the need for a cheaper source of power which can be produced domestically.

This is why renewed attention to the ASEAN Power Grid (APG) and the ASEAN Petroleum Security Agreement (APSA) as potential anchors for deeper regional integration was a welcome update. 

The APSA aims to enhance energy security in the region through securing supply of oil and oil products, minimizing the region’s exposure to energy crises. Meanwhile, the APG envisions an interconnected electricity grid for ASEAN by 2045, reducing power costs and accelerating decarbonization in the region. Both could reduce external energy dependency and reinforce ASEAN’s internal cohesion.

Despite these, caution is necessary when pushing for interconnectedness, and a thorough understanding of national and local contexts is recommended. In the Philippines, even upgrading domestic transmission lines means high upfront costs on the national level, while frequent typhoons, floods, and earthquakes threaten connectivity and energy access in local communities.

With these local contexts in mind, these initiatives are not merely technical infrastructure projects; they are mechanisms for regional resilience and energy sovereignty when implemented with Southeast Asian communities in mind. By enabling ASEAN countries to share energy resources and stabilize supply, they can help shield communities from recurring oil price shocks and external market inconsistency.

Furthermore, discussions flagged the risk that ASEAN’s renewable energy transition could lead to large companies capturing the most lucrative opportunities while communities are excluded. Simultaneous to the calls for a renewable energy shift was also a just transition for the people of ASEAN, which requires attention to the social and economic impacts of fossil fuel phaseout, particularly for communities dependent on these industries.

Analysis from the Climate Policy Institute Indonesia showed that coal, oil, and natural gas still attract the majority of energy financing in Southeast Asia despite their growing economic and geopolitical risks. Participants stressed that understanding where climate finance flows, and where it does not, is essential to building a credible and equitable transition pathway for the region.

For Climate Reality Philippines and many civil society organizations present, renewable energy was framed not only as a climate solution, but as a strategic pathway toward greater national and regional resilience. Solar energy, for example, can be deployed by local communities, cooperatives, households, and MSMEs, not just by large utilities or multinational companies. This decentralization strengthens community resilience while reducing dependence on volatile imported fuels.

But the convening also warned against allowing the renewable energy transition to replicate the same extractive and unequal systems associated with fossil fuel industries. Left entirely to market forces, the transition risks becoming concentrated in the hands of large corporations while frontline communities remain excluded from decision-making that affects their lives.

Overall, Climate Reality Philippines’ engagement in this convening through its climate diplomacy work is especially relevant here, because it gives civil society a way to press for climate action by linking local realities to national, regional, and even global decision-making platforms.

The more critical lesson from Cebu is that ASEAN’s energy transition will only be credible if it is regional, coordinated, and people-first. As emphasized by Climate Reality Philippines during the four-day convening, “what does it truly take for ASEAN to put its people first? Resiliency. A resilient regional bloc prioritizes the security of its people above all else; that means a farmer in Central Mindanao or a fisherfolk in Mekong Delta no longer pay the price of surging electricity, fuel, and food because the region cannot compete economically or shield itself from external shocks. ASEAN has the collective power, innate resources, strategic geopolitical leverage, and its people to negotiate and decide as one united bloc”.

The regional bloc was built to help its people navigate a turbulent world. The task now is to ensure that the region’s institutions and climate diplomacy efforts actually do that.

***

Categories
Blog Post

Fujifilm Philippines captures stable electricity prices by bringing GEOP into focus

Fujifilm Philippines captures stable electricity prices by bringing GEOP into focus

By Poch Enriquez

I

In photography, capturing a great image depends on achieving the right exposure. You need a careful balance of light sensitivity, aperture, and shutter speed to produce a clear and stable result. In today’s volatile energy landscape, Philippine businesses face a similar challenge: how to focus on sustainability while insulating themselves from fluctuating electricity prices driven by global oil supply constraints.

For Fujifilm Philippines, the solution is to focus its energy lens toward renewables.

Since December 2023, the company’s manufacturing plant in Laguna has been sourcing electricity through the Green Energy Option Program (GEOP). This voluntary mechanism enables businesses to procure power directly from renewable energy suppliers instead of relying on their distribution utility’s procurement choices. Through GEOP, Fujifilm Philippines has been able to capture a snapshot of predictable electricity costs while advancing its sustainability goals.

“FUJIFILM OPTICS PHILIPPINES INC. is proud to utilize 100% renewable electricity, ensuring the production of superior quality products while steadfastly minimizing environmental impact,” said Engr. Rico Racoma, Head of Facilities.

This shift aligns with the broader direction of FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation, which aims to source 50% of its electricity from renewable energy by 2030. Based on its latest sustainability report, the company is currently at around 20%.

This commitment is reflected in its Philippine operations. By participating in GEOP, Fujifilm Philippines has reduced an estimated 7,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions over 27 months, based on standard government and supplier-provided emission factors.

Managing electricity costs is much like stabilizing a shot in low light; small fluctuations can have big impacts. For Fujifilm Philippines, shifting to GEOP helps reduce exposure to these swings. According to the Energy Regulatory Commission, GEOP rates average around PHP 6.73 per kWh, while Meralco rates over the same period have averaged PHP 7.20 per kWh, fluctuating between PHP 5.00 and PHP 8.00 per kWh.

These swings are largely tied to global fossil fuel markets, and ongoing oil supply tensions in the Middle East continue to threaten electricity price stability in the Philippines. Renewable energy and its mechanisms, such as GEOP, reduce exposure to price volatility and provide VAT-free electricity that lowers operational costs.

Fujifilm Philippines is also editing out its emissions by extending sustainability efforts across its production processes, beyond its shift to renewable energy.

By August 2026, the company plans to launch a Circular Manufacturing Center, where used machines will be disassembled, inspected, and rebuilt into fully functional units. Each remanufactured product undergoes the same rigorous quality checks as new equipment, reducing e-waste and extending product life cycles.

The company is also addressing the environmental impact of digital storage. ‘Cold data’, rarely accessed but still valuable, is being shifted from energy-intensive data centers to more efficient tape storage systems. 

In photography, great images rely on technical control over light, motion, and exposure. However, it is the photographer’s point of view and composition that captures the attention of the audience. Fujifilm Philippines had the perspective to shift to GEOP and snap more predictable electricity costs.

In an uncertain global landscape, GEOP offers something increasingly rare: a clearer, more stable picture of the future.

***

Categories
Columns Eleventh Hour at the Manila Bulletin Press Releases

Should we, together, move for a complete energy transition in the Philippines?

Should we, together, move for a complete energy transition in the Philippines?

By JM Dumdum

I

The Philippines became the first country in the world in March 2026 to declare a national energy emergency, triggered by geopolitical conflicts happening more than four time zones away. Diesel and gasoline prices doubled and even tripled almost overnight. Every jeepney driver absorbing higher fuel costs, every trucking company passing price increases down the supply chain, and every household paying more for goods that had to travel farther to get there felt the same crisis, but not in the same way. Those with the least buffer felt it the most.

The irony is that the Philippines is transitioning, but not everyone feels it.

The story of how the Philippines went from a renewable energy leader to fossil fuel dependence has been told before. What is less often discussed is what that shift created beyond the power sector.

While the grid has slowly been moving toward renewables, the transport sector tells us a different story. Millions of jeepneys, trucks, buses, and motorcycles continue to run almost entirely on imported fuel. Oil deregulation in the late 1990s removed the price cushions that once protected consumers from global fuel market swings, meaning that—unlike some of our Southeast Asian neighbors that kept initiatives to soften pump price increases—Filipino consumers absorb the full force of every global oil price movement.

When fuel prices spike, it is not only electricity bills that rise but also the cost of moving food from our farms and fisheries to palengkes and supermarkets across the country. It is the fare a commuter pays and the price of every good that has to be transported to get to our doorsteps. Oil dependence in transport is not just an environmental problem but is also a cost-of-living problem. It falls hardest on those who have no alternative.

Cost-effective and clean, RE can replace traditional sources of energy like fossil fuels for a fraction of the cost for both the government and its constituents

The exposure does not stop at geopolitics. The Philippines sits at the intersection of two compounding crises, and the incompleteness of our energy transition makes us more vulnerable to both.

On the grid side, the renewable sources Filipinos are increasingly depending on are themselves vulnerable to climate variability. El Niño events, which are projected to become more frequent and intense in 2026 and early 2027, are lowering water levels in reservoirs, reducing hydroelectric output, and forcing the grid to compensate with traditional power generation sources at precisely the moment when imported fuel is most expensive. 

Prolonged rainy days and cloud cover reduce solar output, while rapidly shifting wind patterns impacted by climate change affect wind energy reliability. The RE sources we are betting on require storage, grid flexibility, and diversified generation to be truly resilient, and we are not yet where we need to be.

On the transport side, the climate impacts are equally distinct. Extreme heat raises fuel consumption and operating costs for drivers already running on imported diesel and gasoline with no price buffer. Flooding from stronger typhoons and prolonged rainfall damages roads, bridges, and port infrastructure, disrupting supply chains and raising logistics costs that, again, fall hardest on those with the least ability to absorb them. The electric vehicle (EV) transition that would free the transport sector from such exposure becomes less reliable if the grid underperforms due to lower variable RE output during El Niño with insufficient storage.

The result is a gap in the overall idea of a just energy transition. Renewable energy (RE) is growing in the power sector, but its benefits are not reaching the jeepney driver, the market vendor, or the logistics worker whose daily costs are still dependent on events outside our shores. Every climate event that reduces RE output on the grid forces a return to traditional fuels, and every one that damages transport infrastructure raises costs for people already without price protection. These two vulnerabilities reinforce each other, and both are made worse by the fact that we have only made advances in one half of the transition.

Current efforts to transition to RE by businesses and households have showcased promising results for the economy’s stability.

Climate advocates and energy sustainability practitioners have long argued that the transition we need is a fiscal and economic opportunity, not just an environmental necessity. The evidence is already visible through billions in stranded energy assets, hundreds of millions in annual diesel subsidies for island grids, and now a national energy emergency that exposed just how thin our buffers were. Beyond the grid, every peso not invested in transport electrification, grid storage, and climate-resilient infrastructure is a peso keeping Filipinos exposed to the next shock, whether it comes from a contested strait or stronger and more frequent typhoons.

Energy transition delivers value across multiple dimensions by lowering operating costs, reducing pollution-related health risks, building consumer trust, and strengthening talent attraction particularly among younger generations. Programs from tax incentives in RE and EV infrastructure buildup to larger initiatives such as the Green Energy Option Program and the Retail Aggregation Program position RE adoption as a supply chain advantage in Southeast Asia. Electrifying transport—from e-jeepneys and e-tricycles to last-mile delivery vehicles—extends that same logic to the road. However, these programs can only fulfill their promise if they are pursued as part of a complete, holistic transition.

The energy transition we need is not only a moral commitment but also a practical one. Leaving transport behind will keep producing energy crises. Ignoring climate variability in RE planning will keep producing grid vulnerabilities. A transition that does not bring workers, drivers, and communities along will continue to leave people behind. Getting it right, therefore, means doing all of it together.

Transforming the energy conversation does not require a government position or a technical degree. It starts in our own circles: at the dinner table, in group chats, and in the communities that we are already part of. When energy is in the news, recall that this is not a one-time event but a weakness we inherited, formed by decades of incomplete decisions that affect how we power our homes, move goods, commute to work, and keep food affordable.

Ask more of your elected officials, from both local and national levels, not just for fuel subsidies or tax suspensions but for long-term investments in grid infrastructure, storage, local renewable capacity, and policies that accelerate the shift to electric and alternative fuel vehicles in public transport. Hold the business community to the same standard, asking whether the companies you work for or support have begun planning for a low-carbon future that covers both their energy consumption and their logistics and transport operations.

One’s positive experience with RE technologies is a story worth hearing; especially for policymakers still unsure of RE’s capacity to sustainably power the nation.

Now that we know how this story ends when we stop paying attention, we also know how it can end when we do. What it takes is a collective commitment, sustained across households, boardrooms, and barangay halls, to finish the transition we started for every Filipino.

This energy transition should belong to all of us. Let’s all make sure it gets there.

***

JM Dumdum

ABOUT THIS AUTHOR

Jonas Marie “JM” Dumdum is a Registered Chemist, Climate Reality Leader, Sustainability Practitioner, and a Renewable Energy Advocate. He is also a coordinator under the Energy Subcluster of the Climate Reality Leadership Corps in the Philippines. Apart from his work in management consulting, integrating sustainability-related topics into corporate governance, and advancing science-based principles in Philippine regulations for sustainability reporting, he is a co-founder and co-host of the SUSTAINARUMBLE! Podcast, the first podcast in the Philippines that tackles issues on sustainability at the national level.

Categories
Blog Feature Eleventh Hour at the Manila Bulletin

In a chokehold: how fossil fuel dependence suffocates the Philippine transport system amidst oil price shocks

In a chokehold: how fossil fuel dependence suffocates the Philippine transport system amidst oil price shocks

Iran is approximately 7,000 kilometers away from the Philippines. But an ongoing war in that part of the world rattles ours almost immediately.

This conflict in West Asia (or Middle East to the Western world) has disrupted crude oil shipments to the Philippines, a country that imports about 98% of it to power almost everything from commerce to agriculture. A lower supply of crude oil spells oil and gas spikes across the board.

Crude oil, or petroleum, is a fossil fuel. Global usage of fossil fuels directly contributes to climate change, which is driven by greenhouse gas emissions from said fossil fuels. Much of the Philippines is powered by fossil fuels; in fact, in our energy mix, coal and oil products make up about 60% (34% and 30%, respectively).

This dependence on planet-warming fossil fuels has had us in a chokehold for years—and this grip tightens whenever the global supply of fossil fuels is disrupted.

Addressing the grip of crude oil

One of the first to feel this price shock is the transport sector, mainly public utility vehicle (PUV) operators and drivers. Households—especially those in vulnerable communities including low-income households, informal workers, small businesses, and farmers—are disproportionately affected, with limited capacity to absorb rising costs.

Before all this, what had cost around PHP 40/L of fuel for tricycle drivers now costs around PHP 90/L. Jeepney drivers, of course, weren’t spared. From PHP 71, a liter of diesel now costs around PHP 170. That’s a huge jump, especially considering how these spikes also extend to commodities such as groceries and utilities.

In a country that depends on volatile fossil fuel markets, disruptions hit transport systems and cascade into food, livelihoods, and economic stability, affecting people’s ability to move and access essential services.

To address the issue of unpredictable and uncontrollable price hikes, many voices from all sides of the political spectrum have offered solutions. Prominent proposals include transport fare hikes and suspension of excise taxes on fuel.

Despite the promise of these solutions, it has been slow-going. Recently, President Bongbong Marcos pumped the brakes on the fare hikes. And although the bill granting him powers to suspend fuel excise tax has been signed by the President, it won’t take effect until fifteen days after its publication – which in this case happens well into the second week of April.

These solutions may give the Filipino people a brief respite from the recent oil price shocks. Coveted as they are, these fixes are but temporary. They do not grant us immunity from future disruptions in global crude oil supply.

Voices from civil society and climate action organizations offer a different perspective: phase out dependence on fossil fuels and accelerate the shift to renewable, indigenous sources of energy.

Hands on our necks, we don’t shift to breathe better; we push back to escape the grip.

Renewable energy sources like solar power is touted as a cheaper, more stable alternative to fossil fuels
Loosening fossil fuels’ hold

Powering our country mainly with fossil fuels has put us in this unenviable position of being helpless amidst geopolitical tensions. But should we invest in domestic and renewable energy resources, we can reduce, if not entirely avoid, disruption in energy supply.

This article by the Institute for Climate and Sustainable Cities (ICSC) has outlined how other countries like India and Indonesia have implemented efforts to provide accessible public transportation. This they did through people-centered fare policies and electrifying transport fleets.

Fast-tracking the shift to clean energy also provides us with a cheaper alternative to fossil fuels, not to mention a healthier one. For example, diesel-powered vehicles are known to belch black smoke in our streets, significantly making the air quality poor and harming human health. With diesel prices skyrocketing, utilizing electric vehicles sounds attractive.

Accelerating transition to cleaner public transport, efficient logistics systems, and strengthened transport systems that are affordable, accessible, and reliable is essential. Active mobility programs such as cycling and walking must also be a core of the government transport program, not just in reducing dependence to fuel-based transport amid global price volatility, but also to advance for sustainable and resilient transportation systems.

Local renewable energy infrastructure allows the Philippines to shield itself from rotating blackouts and high electricity costs during geopolitical tensions that disrupt fossil fuel supply chains. RE is cheaper, cleaner, and is a long-term solution to our energy woes compared to stopgap measures such as the suspension of fuel excise taxes or declarations of national emergency.

We’ve seen RE easing fossil fuel dependency issues in Pakistan. When the Russia-Ukraine war broke out in 2022, the citizens of Pakistan suffered energy shortages. This prompted a wide-scale, household, and business-led adoption of rooftop solar. This transition has so far ‘insulated Pakistan’s power sector’ from current market disruptions.

But in the Philippines, that’s easier said than done without government intervention. For example, the planned PUV Modernization Program drew a lot of flak from stakeholders for placing the burden of electrification on small-scale operators and drivers. A unit would cost upward of a million pesos, a price tag entirely unaffordable to the common tsuper.

Besides, an electric vehicle charged by a fossil fuel-powered grid like ours is still vulnerable to global oil supply shocks. Electrification without decarbonization will not pay off in the long run.

Climate finance is needed to fund just transition initiatives, including replacing fossil fuels with clean energy
Financing our freedom

What we need is money to fund the just transition to renewable energy – money we can get either from the government or outside sources such as multilateral banks or other countries looking to offset their emissions. 

Using climate finance, we can subsidize the electrification of our transport fleets. Doing so will now shift the burden of powering our transport system (and indeed our whole economy) to the government instead of the Filipino people. 

This means securing a steady supply of climate finance, or funding reserved for programs that reduce a country’s emissions or bolster its climate resiliency. This is aligned with the concept of just transition, a principle that leaves no one behind in sustainable development.

Being one of the top climate-vulnerable countries in the world, the Philippines should be given priority to receive climate financing. Given our historically low emissions, by rights we should be cashing in on the concept of ‘polluters pay’ in terms of global responsibility to address climate change.

If handled correctly, climate finance can catalyze our transition to renewable energy and our freedom from fossil fuel dependence. Although this cannot immediately relieve the common Filipino from recent price hikes, it can surely shield them from similar incidents in the future. 

Institutionalizing decarbonization efforts is well under way in the Philippines. A prime example of this is our Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC), commitments we’ve made to reduce our emissions under the 2015 Paris Agreement. Under our NDCs are policies and measures designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in a variety of sectors, including top emitters like transport and energy—fields directly affected by the volatility of our fossil fuel dependence.

Policies and measures in our NDCs outlining our transition to reduce fossil fuel usage in transport include the PUV Modernization Program, promotion of electric vehicles via the EV Industry Development Act, and expansion of active transport initiatives.

Currently, the Climate Change Commission and its partner agencies in climate policy are drafting the country’s most recent NDC text. Climate Reality Philippines hopes that these revamped NDC commitments reflect the urgency needed in addressing both the climate and energy crises, while keeping emissions reduction pledges ambitious and inclusive. 

After all, the NDC is not just a document outlining our plans to address climate change; it is a framework of how we must do it while ensuring sustainable development. 

Solutions like shifting to clean energy and reducing emissions then become matters of economic, health, and climate foresight. What we do now impacts how we get to respond to crises out of our control—like a war thousands of kilometers away.

***

Categories
Press Releases

Climate Reality PH’s Project Niche empowers Pangasinan youth to solve the plastic crisis

Climate Reality PH’s Project Niche empowers Pangasinan youth to solve the plastic crisis

Last February 26, The Climate Reality Project Philippines held a two-day ‘Klima Eskwela: Climate Science, Arts, and Action’ workshop at Pangasinan State University (PSU) Main Campus in Lingayen, Pangasinan.

Held in partnership with the Climate Change Commission (CCC), PSU, and the municipal government of Lingayen, this event taught student leaders the fundamentals of the climate and plastic crises in hopes of encouraging participants to develop innovative ways to promote grassroots solutions to these issues.

“We’re all here to talk about climate change, whose impacts you have much experience with. But we want you to understand not just the impacts but also the solutions,” said Aimee Oliveros, Branch Manager of Climate Reality Philippines.

Providing seed funds and mentorship to bring these ideas to life is Project Niche, Climate Reality Philippines’ project incubator and capacity-building initiative for the youth. 

PSU is the third state university to be offered a chance to implement a plastic-free campus initiative with funding through Project Niche; the two others were Caraga State University and Eastern Visayas State University, both of which hosted Klima Eskwela.

“The fight against climate change and plastic pollution will be won not only by policies or international negotiations abroad. It starts in the classroom and in your own homes. It’s nurtured in our communities and fostered by the leadership of young people who are committed and willing to act,” said Atty. Rachel Anne Herrera, Commissioner at CCC.

Learners include student leaders and science majors, as well as professors and university administrators

Located along the Lingayen Gulf, the municipality of Lingayen is prone to a number of climate hazards typical of seaside communities, including coastal flooding and storm surges. But when asked about their unique experience of climate change, PSU students said that extreme heat is felt and observed most immediately.

“During the times na super init [here in Lingayen], it’s humid so yung heat ramdam na ramdam mo na talaga sya; if you’re not in a well-ventilated place, hinihingalin ka talaga. It gets to the point na sa sobrang init nya, kahit malapit lang [ang pupuntahan mo], kailangan mong magtricycle because yung init n’ya— you’re gonna get burned,” said Marrian Flor Castro, the first-year representative of PSU Lingayen’s Student Alliance of Future Biologists.

(“During the times when it gets extremely hot here in Lingayen, it’s very humid, so you really feel the heat intensely. If you’re not in a well-ventilated place, you can end up short of breath. Sometimes it gets so hot that even if you’re only going somewhere nearby, you still need to take a tricycle because of the heat—you feel like you’re going to get burned.”)

Early this March, the community of Lingayen experienced a heat index of 40°C. In the same month last year, it reached an all-time high of 48°C according to our state weather bureau, PAGASA. This ‘danger level’ warns of high risks of heat cramps, exhaustion, and stroke. In fact, several stories of such medical emergencies were common in Lingayen.

First-year biology student Marrian Flor Castro talks about the impact of climate change in her community, highlighting the extreme heat often experienced by Lingayen

In addition to adverse health impacts, climate change has also disrupted the students’ learning. In recent years, the extreme heat has worsened to the point where classes had to be suspended for up to a week. 

“Ang naging epekto po sa amin na mga schools na nagpo-produce ng mga isda, may times po na yung mga laboratories po namin, yung mga experiments po namin, yung mga isda— namatay po sila,” said Lance Phillip Urbien, Fishery Major and Supreme Student Council President of PSU Binmaley Campus.

“Ang nangyari po ay either termination po of the study or uulit kami. Akala po namin masaya na walang pasok— pero ‘yun pala, napabayaan namin. Kasi di rin kami papayagan pumasok ng school so hindi kami nakakapakain ng isda. Halos natuyo na pala ang tubig.”

(“For us in schools that produce fish, there were times when our laboratories and experiments were affected—our fish died. What happened was that our studies were either terminated or we had to start over. At first, we thought having no classes was good, but it turned out that things were neglected. We also weren’t allowed to enter the school, so we couldn’t feed the fish. Eventually, the water had almost dried up.”)

Urbien also connected these with the same issues faced by Lingayen fisherfolk, whose livelihood is prone to being disturbed by the rising temperatures.

PSU-Binmaley Supreme Student Council President Lance Phillip Urbien presents his group’s sensory map, an artwork showcasing their unique perspective on climate change

Their students’ struggles with climate change are not lost to PSU administrators. No less than the Lingayen Campus Executive Director, Dr. Marie Claire Briones, extended her support for the students’ meaningful participation in Klima Eskwela.

“[Climate change] is a cry for help from nature; [it’s asking us] to be its stewards. This means doing something to address the crisis– using our voice. After all, what’s the sense of having one if we don’t use it?” said Dr. Briones.

A total of 75 participants attended the workshops, comprising science majors, youth organization leaders, and professors from PSU’s Lingayen and Binmaley campuses. By the end of Klima Eskwela, attendees were equipped with skills in project management and policy development.

Klima Eskwela’s lectures about the climate and plastic crises, were taught by Sophia Manzano, Development Management Officer from CCC, and Joseph Pilapil, Climate Reality Philippines’ Plastic-Free Reality Program Lead.

Local climate action and solid waste management plans were also discussed by guests from local governments, namely: Joe Simon Coloma, Climate Resiliency Staff from the Pangasinan DRRMO; Clark Mamaril, Local DRRM Officer at the Lingayen Municipal DRRM Office; and Adamson Miña, Jr., an Environmental Management Specialist from the Lingayen Municipal Environment and Natural Resources Office (MENRO).

AktivAsia Pilipinas’ Engr. Elainne Lopez discusses the art and science of campaigning for the planet

AktivAsia Pilipinas’ Engr. Elainne Lopez facilitated the project management workshops, while Atty. Megan Mateo from CCC’s Legal Services Division taught students about policy writing.

These sessions were designed to encourage learners to develop youth-led and community-based solutions to the plastic crisis, to be supported by resources from Project Niche.

For example, Miña discussed previous efforts of the MENRO to engage PSU in tackling their waste problem, including conducting a waste analysis and characterization study (WACS) in the university. 

The WACS with PSU showcased what types of waste the institution produces, which it can use to implement policies to lessen or eliminate certain types of trash like single-use plastics. Based on the WACS conducted, 42% of PSU’s waste were recyclables like plastic and paper.

From these insights and the lectures conducted during Klima Eskwela, the students drafted potential policies to address waste in PSU. This includes information, education, and communication (IEC) campaigns, banning of waste burning, and eliminating single-use plastics in the campus through policies and regulations.

Klima Eskwela opened up opportunities for us— as students, as a small part of the community, the small things we do can help solve problems [like climate change]. Na, even though you’re small, your participation can be part of the solution,” added Castro.

***