Categories
Eleventh Hour at the Manila Bulletin

Eleventh Hour: Food Today, Food Tomorrow, Makisawsaw, and climate action

Eleventh Hour: Food Today, Food Tomorrow, Makisawsaw, and climate action

By Karla Rey

Food Today, Food Tomorrow (FTFT) began as a food relief initiative in the early days of extreme enhanced community quarantine. Initially named Lingap Maralita (Care for the Poor), it was motivated by collective action and mutual aid.  It was a call for solidarity with those often excluded or marginalized from public assistance—informal wage earners, street dwellers, landless peasants—therefore without the safety nets to survive the severe impacts of the lockdown.

 

 

While charity is often conceived in terms of a beneficiary–benefactor relationship, Lingap Maralita takes the view that everyone is valuable and has something to offer. The poor, despite their poverty, were not mere beneficiaries.

As we sourced fresh organic vegetables from small farmers and brought those to urban poor communities in Metro Manila, beneficiary communities organized and led the weekly kusinang bayan (community kitchens) to mitigate the growing hunger around them.

This spirit of care and solidarity resonated with many people. Stories and testimonies from urban poor communities and citizen groups exposed how multiple issues on food security, social justice, and equal access impact the most vulnerable sectors of society.

It was also during Lingap Maralita’s run that Pinagkaisang Lakas ng Mamamayan-Payatas approached us in the core group and expressed their interest in a more sustainable way to secure food: growing it themselves.

After that, the two-pronged FTFT program was born. Shaped by consultations with the communities and partner organizations, FTFT combines the previous food relief model “Food Today” (which aims to immediately address hunger) with the micro food gardens “Food Tomorrow” (which aims to address food insecurity).

Piloted in November 2020 in Payatas, 20 volunteer urban growers co-designed a community-based food security strategy. Today, some of these farmers are now trainers in the replication site in Bagong Silangan, where they share their experience and empower other members of the community to do the same.

Makisawsaw Recipes x Ideas: The Community Gardens Edition, which was edited by Joyce Santos, Carissa Pobre, and yours truly and published in November 2021 by feminist independent publisher Gantala Press, supports the work of FTFT.

The book builds on the concept of sawsawan (condiments) used to customize a dish to one’s taste. The book was published after a condiment-making event, where concerned citizens met with workers who participated in a strike calling out the unjust labor practices of NutriAsia, one of the biggest manufacturers of some of the Philippines’ top sawsawan brands. Sawsaw also connotes “dipping” into or participating in affairs or conversations that are not in one’s usual sphere. It’s a foot in. Makisawsaw, now a series of books responding to issues on food, is an invitation to engage with the political nature of food and a tool to raise funds in solidarity with the plight of those most vulnerable to systemic injustice and social inequality.

With over 70 plant-based recipes, using accessible ingredients, the book also contains stories that remind us how cooking is a shared experience. Contributors include award-winning chefs, urban poor growers from the community, and food justice activists.

The book touches on the vital importance of community-shared, organic, and in-season agriculture that restores and cares for the land and shows that consumers can be co-producers of our food, helping address the climate crisis in many ways. It is a reminder of the basic yet potent form of power we all have: our ability to choose, not only where and how we spend our time and money but also how we choose to align ourselves in terms of social and political action.

The book calls on people to start with their own produce and kitchen staples. It suggests that we actively seek out, buy from, and recommend growers and enterprises, particularly small farmers and producers, who have made real commitments to addressing issues on food and climate change through regenerative, locally driven, and place-based agricultural practices. This not only supports these businesses to keep up this good work but also shows other sectors of society that business-as-usual will no longer cut it.

As highly industrialized countries continue to build their economies on the back of fossil fuels, those who have done the least to cause environmental damages are bearing the brunt of climate change impacts. They are the most vulnerable in the face of changing weather patterns and rising sea levels, causing violent storms and floods that result in greater food shortages and making already dire living conditions worse.

This injustice makes it clear that advocating for the rights of the most vulnerable to clean food, safe water, and shelter is part of climate action, which I am humbled to take on as part of the FTFT’s core group. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

***

ABOUT THE AUTHOR 

 

One of the founding members of Slow Food Sari-sari, Karla Rey is a Climate Reality Leader who believes that stories shared over good food with great company are essentials to a happy life. As Mabi David’s partner in Me and My Veg Mouth and a certified plant-based cook, Karla hopes to contribute to changing the perception that eating vegetables is boring and expensive.

Karla is one of the co-owners of Lubihan Siargao. Along with other Siargao groups and organizations, she is organizing relief efforts for the victims of Typhoon Odette. For anyone who is interested to help, she may be reached at lubihansiargao@gmail.com.

ABOUT ELEVENTH HOUR

This article was originally published on The Climate Reality Project Philippines’ weekly column for the Manila Bulletin called Eleventh Hour.

This column serves a digital space to discuss our organization’s work on supporting the country’s just transition into a clean, affordable, and self-sufficient energy system; advancing sustainable urban mobility to highlight the issues of equity and democracy; and raising public awareness about the need to phase out single-use plastics. It also serves as a platform for Pinoy Climate Reality Leaders to share your stories, promote your climate initiatives, and provide critical insights to issues that matter to climate action, environmental protection, and sustainable development.

Categories
Eleventh Hour at the Manila Bulletin

Eleventh Hour: Mainstreaming post-disaster mental health interventions in the Philippines

Eleventh Hour: Mainstreaming post-disaster mental health interventions in the Philippines

By Ruzzel Morales

Typhoon Frank, which struck our municipality in Iloilo in 2008, still lives vividly in my mind. I remember how the night before the flood, my sisters and I, one of whom is a differently abled person, were nonchalant about what was happening outside. The blackout did not bother us because that meant playing shadow puppets on the wall again. We did not know what was coming to us.

 

What came after was a rush of events no one woke up prepared for. Our neighbor shouted, “May baha!” Flood was coming. My parents rushed to pack our bags. Then the water started filling our house, engulfing what little we had.

Confused, I modeled the actions of the adults around me: panicking to carry whatever could be rescued from our house that was quickly going underwater. A few minutes later, I found myself drowning, catching my breath like a fish out of water. Thankfully, one of our neighbors rescued me. Not knowing what to do, I did what others were doing: I ran as fast as I could, with only one slipper, semi-naked, until where my breath could take me.

The evacuation center was full of confusion. Children and adults alike could be heard wailing, grieving for the lives lost and for an uncertain future. This was not only in our municipality. In less than an hour, according to Relief Web, around 80 percent of Iloilo Province went underwater, affecting 48,836 families and 244,090 persons.

Healing in a drowning world

The magnitude of destruction after a typhoon and other climate-related disasters is usually beyond the victim’s expectation. Years of hard work, gone in just a few minutes—leaving the victims trying to rebuild their lives. This is hard for every adult, especially since there’s also almost no space to feel.

Surviving in disasters is, in itself, exhausting. It is physically draining. However, another aspect of dealing with disaster is its mental and emotional labor. According to the Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, debriefing is an opportunity for education about responses to trauma such as emotional reactions to disaster, somatic reactions, violence, substance abuse, and family stress.

Growing amidst disasters

While disasters and post-disaster rehabilitation are challenging for heteronormative neurodivergent adults, they are incomprehensible for a child and unbearable for the differently abled—especially if these children are from low-income communities.

Children are among the most vulnerable in our communities and often the most affected in disaster scenarios. According to the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), as cited by the National Disaster Risk Reduction Management Council, (NDRRMC), there are more than 30 million Filipinos under 18 that are vulnerable and may be subject to the disproportionate effects of disasters.

This highlights how prevalent mental health issues are, particularly on children that experienced climate-related disasters.

Children have a higher susceptibility to harm and suffering. They have limited coping and adaptive capacities, according to Carolyn Kousley, who studied the impacts of disasters on children. In addition, she identified that children tend to experience somatic concerns ranging from headaches, sleep problems, academic difficulty anxiety, and depression post-disaster.

Studies show that significant distress on the children due to the disruption of social networks during and after disasters is pivotal to their development. In particular, without access to mental health services, they are more likely to engage in delinquent behavior such as alcohol and substance abuse once they reach adolescence.

Absence of post-disaster debriefing, along with other rehabilitation efforts, enables a breeding ground for life-long trauma which will affect children in their adulthood.

Bridging frameworks into action

Mainstreaming mental health interventions post-disaster is where Republic Act No. 11036, or the Mental Health Act of 2017, intersects with Republic Act No. 10121 or the Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010.

However, Republic Act No. 10121—the main legal framework in preventing, responding, and rehabilitating communities after disasters—does not fully incorporate mental health. Health is used as an umbrella terminology in the law and mainstreaming debriefing and other mental health interventions is not nuanced. This vagueness can be used as a loophole for local governments to view psycho-social services post-disaster as a prerogative rather than a priority for implementation.

Streamlining the role of the government and agencies in formulating, developing, and implementing programs that ensure the provision of psychosocial support services to communities is an urgent matter as climate-related disasters are expected to intensify amid the worsening climate crisis.

As the fourth most affected country by weather-related events from 2000-2019 according to Germanwatch’s 2021 Global Climate Risk Index, we have no time to spare. With the recent Typhoon Odette leaving unprecedented destruction, we must expedite the mainstreaming of psychosocial services into our current disaster risk reduction and management plans.

We can’t let our next generation live with disaster-related trauma. Filipinos, especially the youth, should not be burdened by the fear, anxiety, depression, and other mental health problems that are aggravated by our volatile climate. That is unjust.

Thus, aside from integrating psychosocial services in post-disaster response, we must continue to demand climate justice from the culprits that brought the country into this situation: the Global North, corporations that are doing business-as-usual, and government leaders who have the power to act decisively and sufficiently to address the prevailing climate crisis but betrayed our rights for a livable future.

***

ABOUT THE AUTHOR 
 

Ruzzel Morales is a Climate Reality Leader and Mentor trained by US Vice President Al Gore in 2016. She is a graduate of the University of the Philippines-Visayas in 2019 with a degree of B.A. (Political Science-Community Development). She is also an alumni of the Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative (YSEALI) Academic Fellow at the University of Montana, US under the Maureen and Mike Mansfield Center as part of the Global Environmental Issues and Natural Resource Management for Fall 2019.

ABOUT ELEVENTH HOUR

This article was originally published on The Climate Reality Project Philippines’ weekly column for the Manila Bulletin called Eleventh Hour.

This column serves a digital space to discuss our organization’s work on supporting the country’s just transition into a clean, affordable, and self-sufficient energy system; advancing sustainable urban mobility to highlight the issues of equity and democracy; and raising public awareness about the need to phase out single-use plastics. It also serves as a platform for Pinoy Climate Reality Leaders to share your stories, promote your climate initiatives, and provide critical insights to issues that matter to climate action, environmental protection, and sustainable development.

Categories
Eleventh Hour at the Manila Bulletin

Eleventh Hour: The climate emergency and the need to shift to low-carbon tourism

Eleventh Hour: The climate emergency and the need to shift to low-carbon tourism

By Aphrodite Cruz

As restrictions loosen up and the travel industry slowly recovers from the unprecedented effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, we are faced with another pressing crisis and that is the climate emergency. We are in the most decisive decade of human history—code red as science and environmental experts would say. We are running out of records to break and we have less than a decade to prevent irreversible damages to the planet.

One of the biggest contributors to the climate crisis is the travel industry. According to a study published in the Nature Climate Change Journal in 2018, the travel and tourism sector accounted for about eight percent of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions from 2009 to 2013.

Given this startling revelation, let me talk about the big elephant in the room and pose these nagging questions: Do we pursue the restart of travel, or do we de-market tourism to give our planet a fighting chance? Should we suppress our wanderlust in favor of the environment, or should we teach ourselves to pursue transformative and regenerative travel that helps rather than destroys our planet? How do we move the Philippine travel industry forward at a time of great uncertainty? Could there possibly be a fair and reasonable compromise that benefits both the people’s propensity to travel and the health of our ailing planet?

The travel industry is closest to my heart. I spent a considerable amount of time in the past decade encouraging people, especially Filipinos, to explore the unparalleled beauty and charm of our archipelagic country. I even named my travel and tours business, Las Islas, or The Islands.

But more than promoting our country’s nature destinations and thousands of islands, it’s the economic multiplier effect from the creation of jobs for the locals that gave me a sense of fulfillment from doing it.

But what happens when tourism takes a toll on our nature destinations and leads to the depletion of our resources? If tourism owes everything to nature, shouldn’t we be doing our best to prevent its deterioration?

Tourism is intrinsically linked to climate change. In fact, the travel industry will cease to exist if there are no longer destinations to visit because they’ve been gravely impacted by climate change.

Travel as we know it has completely changed and we are not going back to the way it was. And even if we can, we should not. Deciding whether or not to promote leisure travel at a time of climate emergency is a moral dilemma to both tourists and travel operators alike. There is an urgent need for the travel industry to shift to low-carbon tourism to reduce the carbon footprint of the travel industry.

 

Low-carbon tourism is the kind of travel that contributes the least impact on the planet whether by prioritizing the health of the environment or by offering carbon-offsetting programs. As the world opens up again, we really cannot tell people to stop traveling but what we can do is teach them how to travel responsibly and ethically.

The Philippine tourism industry’s pathway to recovery should be anchored on the principles of low-carbon tourism. Stakeholders from across the tourism value chain need to unlearn old habits and embrace new tourism business practices hinged on sustainability.

We need a paradigm shift in the way we promote and practice tourism. For instance, we should veer away from promoting a tourism destination without respecting its carrying capacity. A carbon footprint auditing system should be in place within tourism organizations. I would even go as far as suggesting that all tourism business owners should have a sustainable development program that includes their 2030-2050 plans of actions toward becoming a net-zero or low-carbon organization. 

What the Department of Tourism did to rehabilitate the world-famous island of Boracay way back in 2018 is proof that prioritizing the planet over profit is possible. I was on this island a few weeks ago and it was evident how much the island has recuperated after its closure. There were no single-use plastics in establishments, instead, you see restaurants and resorts using paper or edible straw made from rice or tapioca. There were segregation waste bins strategically located along the white beach. People still flock to this island in spite of these rules, which only goes to show that tourists aren’t completely mindless toward the environment. They just need to be guided.

I know this to be true based on my experiences as a tour operator. I witnessed first-hand how tourists willingly followed the rules on our company’s traveler’s manifesto or eco pledge. They also understood why we had to ban the use of Styrofoam and single-use plastic on our tours.

If Boracay Island can do it, so can the other destinations in the Philippines. Former US Vice President and Climate Reality Founder Al Gore would always say in his presentations that political will is a renewable resource. With enough cooperation between the public and the private sector, we can pave the way to a more resilient and low-carbon travel industry.

 

It’s time for all active stakeholders to walk the talk on sustainable tourism. Let us envision and work towards creating a Philippine tourism industry that values the health of the earth too. After all, it is the only one we have.

***

ABOUT THE AUTHOR 
 

Aphrodite Cruz is a Climate Reality Leader, writer, communication strategist, PR practitioner, social entrepreneur, and environmental advocate. In 2014, she founded Las Islas Travel Hub Unlimited, Inc. (Las Islas), a travel company recognized for championing responsible and sustainable tourism in Western Visayas, Region 6, and the very first tour operator-recipient of the 2018 ASEAN Sustainable Tourism Award in the Philippines for the eco-tourism product tagged as the Palina Greenbelt River Cruise Experience.

 

ABOUT ELEVENTH HOUR

This article was originally published on The Climate Reality Project Philippines’ weekly column for the Manila Bulletin called Eleventh Hour.

This column serves a digital space to discuss our organization’s work on supporting the country’s just transition into a clean, affordable, and self-sufficient energy system; advancing sustainable urban mobility to highlight the issues of equity and democracy; and raising public awareness about the need to phase out single-use plastics. It also serves as a platform for Pinoy Climate Reality Leaders to share your stories, promote your climate initiatives, and provide critical insights to issues that matter to climate action, environmental protection, and sustainable development.

Categories
Eleventh Hour at the Manila Bulletin

Eleventh Hour: The Philippines’ carbon emissions are so small, why should we care about the COP?

Eleventh Hour: The Philippines’ carbon emissions are so small, why should we care about the COP?

By Atty. Alexandra Gamboa 

Writing and reflecting on each Conference of the Parties (COP) since Paris has always been such an exercise of awareness. It is always a struggle of balancing personal frustrations and beliefs with how the process is going, while also recognizing the many complexities of multi-country negotiations and the context that each one is coming from. It is a whole process that always feels like an ultimate test in patience and compassion, both for self and for the world.

It is with this lens that I, again, reflect on the recently concluded 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) in Glasgow.

The COP26 was unique in many ways. Because of the global pandemic, there had been a lapse of two years between COP25 in Madrid and COP26 in Glasgow, instead of the mandated meeting of the parties every year. It is also against this COVID-19 backdrop where there were significant challenges to participants and attendees: from brand-specific vaccination requirements to additional budgetary considerations such as mandatory quarantine periods, as well as budget reallocations by governments for public health priorities, to limited access to conference areas to prevent overcrowding. These are all necessary given the health pandemic the world is facing right now. However, they are all challenges for meaningful participation in the COP, especially for cash-strapped third-world countries, and even more so for civil society organizations (CSO) with limited funding.

This COP26, we also saw a unique country delegation from the Philippines, this time headed by the Department of Finance (DOF) as the point person for climate finance in the country. We also saw a new set of negotiators, with only veteran Albert Magalang of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) present.

 

A long-standing feature of the delegation was unfortunately missing, that of CSO participation, a feature which has always been touted by other countries as very inclusive and critical in keeping with the whole-of-society approach that the Philippines has always been admired for.

The COP26 is important to the Philippines in many ways, despite our humble contribution to global carbon emissions. Oftentimes, participation in the COP, by virtue of our membership in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and as a signatory to the Paris Agreement, is seen as a source of responsibility or additional burden for a third-world country that has not greatly contributed to causing climate change.

What is less emphasized is the fact that there are many funding opportunities within the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement that we stand to benefit from, and that we have a right to, especially as a country highly vulnerable to climate change, which is precisely why the DOF has not only been actively engaging but now even leading the country delegation to the negotiations.

Equally important to emphasize is the age-old adage of having strength in numbers. Through a coalition of countries like the Philippines, countries that do not account significantly for carbon emissions but are directly impacted by climate change are leading an important paradigm shift that is taking place in the negotiations throughout the years.

 

In the past, mitigation or the cutting down of carbon emissions has been at the forefront of conversations. Now, because of the battle cry of countries like ours, adaptation to climate change effects and reparation for loss and damage from these effects are now added as priorities in the negotiation, highlighting our reality that climate change in the Philippines is here and now, and that some countries suffer from it more than others, and that needs to be addressed.

This COP26 also saw a victory for us where, finally, reference to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) special report on 1.5C was included in the Glasgow document. This was one of the main disappointments from the previous COP25, where some countries did not want to acknowledge the report, which provided scientific basis for the calls for increased ambition. Now, in COP26, not only was the report referenced but it was referenced in the first subheading labeled “science and urgency,” emphasizing further the need for countries, especially those with significant carbon emissions, to rapidly decarbonize.

It is easy to feel discouraged after reading COP26 outcomes when you hear the same common threads: country ambitions are not enough to meet the 1.5C temperature goal, financial pledges are not enough to meet the goals, still no arrangements for loss and damage, and still no language on coal phase-out. But this is exactly why countries like ours need to be vigilant because these are all still battles to be won.

***

ABOUT THE AUTHOR 
 

Atty. Alexandra Gamboa is an environmental and energy lawyer, public policy specialist, and law professor. She is currently a partner in YDL Law and serves as a policy consultant for a number of non-government organizations. She was previously the Manager of Government Initiatives for Rare’s branch office in the Philippines. She was also previously the Deputy Chief of the Legal Services Division of the Climate Change Commission of the Philippines, where she contributed to government policy and negotiated in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change process.

Atty. Alex has been a Climate Reality Leader since 2016 when she attended the training in Manila. She has also served as a mentor for the Global Climate Reality Training in 2020.

ABOUT ELEVENTH HOUR

 

This article was originally published on The Climate Reality Project Philippines’ weekly column for the Manila Bulletin called Eleventh Hour.

This column serves a digital space to discuss our organization’s work on supporting the country’s just transition into a clean, affordable, and self-sufficient energy system; advancing sustainable urban mobility to highlight the issues of equity and democracy; and raising public awareness about the need to phase out single-use plastics. It also serves as a platform for Pinoy Climate Reality Leaders to share your stories, promote your climate initiatives, and provide critical insights to issues that matter to climate action, environmental protection, and sustainable development.

Categories
Press Releases

Environmental defenders: Vote for 2022 polls should be a vote for climate and the environment

Environmental defenders: Vote for 2022 polls should be a vote for climate and the environment

Quezon City – The Filipino people’s vote for next year’s presidential elections should be a vote for the climate and the environment.

This was underscored by environmental human rights defenders during the 21st episode of Klimatotohanan entitled “Fighting Back for the Planet: How Environmental Human Rights Defenders Are Risking Their Today for Our Tomorrow.”

Leon Dulce, National Coordinator of Kalikasan People’s Network for the Environment (PNE), said that the next set of leaders will face the small window the global community has to stop irreversible damage from climate change.

“We have less than a decade to take drastic action for climate justice. In the Philippines, this includes pursuing climate change adaptation, and securing enough climate finance from developed countries for loss and damage, among others,” Dulce said, adding that the country is also in the midst of a protracted pandemic. “The elections will be crucial because whoever wins will have to face these crises together,” he added.

Deign Frolley Soriano, Representative for Biodiversity and Environment of the United Nations Youth Advisory Board, noted that it is rare for politicians to speak in volumes about the environment and environmental defenders.

“As much as we have grassroots leaders who are working on the ground, we also need leaders [in government] that are always pushing for the rights of our people and our environment at the very front,” Soriano said, pointing out that the environmental and climate crises are interwoven with food security, public health, and human rights among others.

PH is Asia’s deadliest place for environmental defenders
 

A report recently released by watchdog Global Witness revealed that the Philippines was the third deadliest country for environmental defenders in the world as it accounted for 29 out of the 279 total land and environmental killings in 2020.

According to the report, the trend of indigenous peoples, being one of the most disproportionally affected types of environmental defenders, continued in 2020. One-third of the total fatal attacks in the past year were against indigenous people. 

Included in those numbers, according to Dulce, are the killings of Tumandok indigenous people leaders in simultaneous police operations in December 2020. The tribe leaders killed were opposing the Jalaur Mega Dam project, which is projected to displace 17,000 indigenous peoples.

“Global Witness’ yearly reports are focused on killings because that’s the sharpest point of the stick. But it represents an even wider and harder-to-document situation of impunity,” Dulce explained.

Lia Mai Torres, Executive Director of Center for Environmental Concerns-Philippines, agreed with Dulce, adding that environmental defenders also face harassment, death threats, illegal arrests, and strategic lawsuits against public participation or SLAPP suits.

Government as human rights duty bearer 

Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, Founder and Executive Director of Tebtebba Foundation, said that the government should be the one protecting environmental defenders.

“The government has ratified a lot of conventions, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in which they are not supposed to torture, arrest illegally, and displace people,” Tauli-Corpuz said.

However, despite supposedly being the “human rights duty bearer,” Tauli-Corpuz said the government failed to protect environmental defenders. “There is a need to educate government institutions, including the military and police,” she added.

Tauli-Corpuz also underscored the need to use international mechanisms to make government accountable, to raise awareness of the cases of extrajudicial killings of environmental defenders, and to campaign against laws that are repressive, illegal, and unjust.

“Justice will come for as long as there are people who are persisting in demanding justice and demanding human rights duty bearers to do their role,” she said.

Adding to this, Torres called for the defunding and abolition of the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC), a government instrumentality criticized for its red-tagging crusade against personalities and groups that are critical of the Duterte administration, including environmental groups.

Environmental Defense Bill pending in Congress

Torres said that the Environmental Defense Bill has been filed in Congress in December 2020.

The said bill aims to provide environmental defenders access to legal counsel and other legal needs and to information on projects involving their communities, increased protection for their public participation, and other mechanisms that will support their advocacy work.

“Let us challenge our lawmakers. If they really want to protect the environment and the environmental defenders, they should support the Environmental Defense Bill,” Torres said.

Panatang Luntian

Dulce said Kalikasan PNE has launched Panatang Luntian, a campaign that aims to encourage the Filipino people to be active citizens of the environment during the 2022 National Elections and to push for the agenda of green and just recovery.
 
The campaign aims to gather 2,000 pledges to vote based on the campaign’s 10-point agenda, which includes, among others, instituting a moratorium on mining, reclamation, fossil fuel power plants, and other extractive and destructive projects; undertaking a just and green recovery plan that will subsidize universally accessible public health and social amelioration, and transition towards a low-carbon, nature-based, and needs-based economy; and recognizing, protecting, and supporting environmental defenders by enacting a policy on the rights of nature and its defenders that will consequently repeal authoritarian laws such as the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020.
 
To learn more about the campaign, visit https://kalikasan.net/panatang-luntian/

***

Categories
#RealiTalk Blog Feature

#RealiTalk: International Day of Persons with Disabilities with Daphne Marie Siega

#RealiTalk: International Day of Persons with Disabilities with Daphne Marie Siega

For our last #Realitalk feature for 2021, we talked to Pinoy Climate Reality Leader Daphne Siega on the need for a disability-inclusive approach when taking action to address climate change.

 
Daphne is a writer, environmental advocate, and special education teacher who co-founded R.E.E.F.S (Ripple Effect: Empowering the Future towards Sustainability)—a non-profit organization that empowers local communities to conserve the ocean ecosystem by educating and promoting sustainable local livelihoods.

For Daphne, ensuring an inclusive, equitable, and sustainable future for persons with disabilities (PWDs) will be a long and meandering journey that will require the involvement and collaboration of all public and private sectors. All sectors must work together to provide PWDs with better access to resources, healthcare, information, and services necessary to adapt to the effects of climate change.

People with disabilities are a resource, not a burden. As a special education teacher, you have worked with children and youth who have a variety of disabilities and special needs. What do you think is the role of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in ensuring a holistic response to the climate crisis that truly leaves no one behind?

 

Daphne: We are all created uniquely and distinctively. Being endowed with special gifts comes with the need to respond to a challenge. Just a brief background, I started my career in the corporate sector, both locally and abroad. I was grateful for the experiences and learnings, yet I was searching for something deeper, something more meaningful. I had the privilege of working with Students With Additional Needs (SWAN for short) and I began to view the world differently. They taught me how to enjoy the simplest of things. They also showed me that what is most essential in life has been provided to us in abundance, and that is nature. It has been helpful to humans, it is a great source of oxygen, it eases muscle tension, it is good for the heart, it is beneficial to our mental health, and most importantly, it strengthens our immune system.

PWDs speak to us in volume, that nature and people (with or without disabilities alike) must work together in harmony. In their own capacities, PWDs can make a significant contribution starting from their own home, where parents play a crucial role. These include food waste reduction, vegetable gardening, choosing foods with less packaging, water conservation, trash segregation, unplugging electronic devices when not in use, and many more. Things done repeatedly become a habit until they become part of their daily living.

We need to understand and appreciate the very foundation of our existence before we dive into the complexities. For humans to prosper and thrive, we must protect our forests, oceans, and soils. Action must be taken collectively, leaving no one behind, before time runs out. 

Last year, the United Nations released its first-ever report on disability rights in the context of climate action. Why do you think it took so long for the rights of PWDs to be mainstreamed in climate conversations? 

 

Daphne: In an article published by Human Rights Watch, women, indigenous peoples, and youth sectors have successfully become part of discussions around climate action. On the other hand, the involvement of the PWD in terms of the climate crisis has been overlooked—a sector that has been vulnerable and voiceless. 

According to the Philippine Statistics Authority, the estimated Philippine population for the year 2020 was 109 million. Out of this number, approximately 53 million are women, 17 million are indigenous peoples, and 19 million are youth. Based on the 2010 Census, the population of PWDs in the Philippines is approximately 1.8 million, or a prevalence of about 1.7%. There has been no updated data available to date, part of the challenge perhaps is the data collection and consolidation since there are different types of PWDs, such as physical, developmental, behavioral/emotional, and sensory impaired disorders. Aside from these, there are also different subcategories under each type. These aspects may possibly be one of the reasons why the rights of the PWDs took so long to be mainstreamed and that the support network they receive is insufficient.

However, the United Nations Human Rights Council made history when it finally adopted a resolution on climate change and the rights of people with disabilities were being given impetus. The resolution calls on governments to adopt a disability-inclusive approach when taking action to address climate change. This will mean better access to adequate resources, healthcare, information, and services necessary to adapt to the effects of climate change.
 
Regardless of which sector we belong to, what we’re fighting for is beyond economic and political progression. If our environment collapses, everything else follows. Being one of the vulnerable sectors, PWDs also have the right to have clean air, water, land, healthy food, and safe environment. It is a challenge to the government, cause-oriented private organizations, and all individuals for that matter to be a voice for the PWDs for they deserve to be heard.
"Regardless of which sector we belong to, what we’re fighting for is beyond economic and political progression. If our environment collapses, everything else follows. Being one of the vulnerable sectors, PWDs also have the right to have clean air, water, land, healthy food, and safe environment."
DAPHNE SIEGA

Disability inclusion is an essential condition to upholding human rights and sustainable development. Do we have existing policies and programs in the country that integrates disability inclusion in critical policymaking and planning processes? 

 

DaphneOur constitution is a vital symbol of democracy in the country. It upholds a just and humane society wherein individuals have equal opportunities to succeed in life. It also serves to protect and conserve our natural environment including but not limited to our forests, mangroves, wildlife, and flora and fauna. The aforementioned are the fundamental principles of our policies and programs related to disability inclusion. Specifically, under Philippine law, PWDs are assisted and protected through Republic Act No. 7277. PWDs are part of the Philippine society, therefore be given full support to the improvement of their total well-being and their integration into the mainstream of society. The state shall adopt policies ensuring the rehabilitation, self-development, and self-reliance of PWDs.

We also have the “Accessibility Law” (Batas Pambansa Bilang 344), an act to enhance the mobility of PWDs by requiring certain buildings, institutions, establishments, and public utilities to install facilities and other devices to promote the realization of the rights of PWDs. They are entitled to participate fully in the social life and the development of the societies in which they live.

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of PWDs (UNCRPD), to which the Philippines is a signatory, also provides for the protection and safety of PWDs in natural disasters.

 

World leaders also promoted a universal, integrated, and transformative vision for a better world via the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), a blueprint to achieve a healthier, more sustainable future for all. PWDs are referenced in various parts of the SDGs, specifically in parts related to education, growth and employment, equality, accessibility of human settlements that are inclusive, safe, and sustainable. 

 

"To promote equality, we must provide opportunities for education, employment, healthcare, and political participation. Consequently, PWDs will be empowered to lead more independent lives and contribute to the well-being of their families and communities, thereby creating together a more inclusive economy."
DAPHNE SIEGA

How can the government and the development sector ensure the inclusion of PWD rights in global, national, and local climate action planning?

 

Daphne: In the context of biophilia, our relationship with the natural environment is innate. Our planet, in its essential nature, is the motion and exchange of energy and information. This movement will continue to flow freely when the government, international and local organizations, as well as the private sector, work hand-in-hand with communities including PWDs when it comes to implementing and adopting policies related to climate action. Listed below are the following propositions:

  • Implement universal designs and create green spaces like parks, playgrounds, and community gardens. These spaces can promote positive social interactions and help improve physical and mental health;
  • Promote and showcase existing projects where PWDs are actively involved to serve as inspiration to other districts and communities; 
  • Provide recognition and incentives to PWDs who are environmental champions and advocates;
  • Invite PWDs as guest speakers of environmental events, either virtually or physically;
  • Obtain updated roster of PWDs and coordinate with concerned LGUs as part of the disaster management plan;
  • Recognize the needs of PWDs as a demographic variable to tailor public health programs and policy development;
  • Involve and take part in local and global environmental activities like tree planting, composting, clean-ups, and so forth; and
  • Appoint a representative on a municipal, provincial, and national level to attend and participate in any climate-related meetings especially when crucial decisions or new policies are to be made.

 

Moreover, as we address the technical aspects, it is also imperative that we, as individuals, examine and re-evaluate how we can serve humanity. We are all capable of giving, loving, and showing appreciation to mother nature and our fellow human beings, including the PWDs. When we share a part of ourselves, our talent, our time, we can make a difference in this world and make it a better place for generations to come.

What is your hope and vision for the Philippines when it comes to advancing the principles of equality, equity, and inclusion in the context of PWD rights?

 

Daphne: Another aspect that needs to be addressed in advancing the principles of equality, equity, and inclusion is the inculcation of values. This may directly or indirectly come from our family-community-school relationships. Values are important because they influence our thoughts, feelings, opinions, and actions. They shape our life experiences. The trust and respect that are fostered help cultivate positive relationships. Value-laden measures play a significant role in the attainment of our desire to improve our society. We must cultivate our inner values with integrity and compassion. Love, compassion, justice, and peace flow generously when we are grounded.

In closing, it is a challenge for all of us to be more appreciative of the beauty of others—to see the ability and capacity, not the disability. May we guide them as they blossom and reach their fullest potential.