The planned “evolution” is in recognition that financial and development institutions must do more in addressing the multiple crises faced by the global community, including the interplay of the climate and the debt crises in the world’s most vulnerable developing countries.

Climate change shocks and disasters have already eliminated US$525 billion from climate-vulnerable economies in the past 20 years, according to research commissioned by the V20 Group of Finance Ministers, representing 58 of the world’s most systemically climate-threatened economies.

These historical losses, together with adverse impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic and the climate crisis, have greatly reduced the fiscal space of low and middle-income climate-vulnerable countries to adapt to the warming world, respond to climate disasters, and meet the cost of low-carbon and climate-resilient development.

In fact, a growing proportion of climate-vulnerable countries are already in or at risk of being in a financial crisis.

Institutions under the World Bank Group should provide the Global South with opportunities to course-correct its debt problems while delivering its climate commitments under the Paris Agreement.

At the Evolution Forum held last April 11, 2023 during the spring meetings of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, Climate Reality Philippines branch manager Nazrin Castro provided the following inputs to the World Bank Group’s Evolution Roadmap:

First, the Evolution Roadmap cannot illustrate the climate crisis as “trade-offs.”

The climate-fueled risks intensify existing risks so it’s not a trade-off. Climate-resilient and the low-carbon transition safeguards our development.

We need the World Bank to step up and pave the way for an international financial architecture that is fit for climate.

Second, a genuine and ambitious Evolution Roadmap must have clear targets and a timeframe in support of the goals of the Paris Agreement.

The Roadmap should be a manifestation of the World Bank’s pivotal role in the low-carbon transition and driving adaptation and resilience of the world economy.

Recognizing the scale and magnitude of the climate crisis and its intersectionality with other global challenges, it should go beyond proposing technical overhauls and direction setting.

Third, the Evolution Roadmap should include strategies, actions, and policies that underpin the Accra-Marrakech Agenda pushed by the V20 Group.

The Roadmap should include strategies that will (1) provide necessary debt relief to debt-distressed climate-vulnerable developing economies; (2) shift investments away from fossil fuels and other carbon-intensive projects, (3) channel capital flow into low-carbon and climate-resilient investments in debt-ridden and climate-vulnerable countries, and (4) ensure the availability of pre-arranged and anticipatory financial support for the unavoidable loss and damage in the most vulnerable communities. 

Lastly, the Evolution Roadmap should uphold the principle of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities embedded in the Paris Agreement.

We need the institution to help climate-vulnerable countries cope with the impacts of the climate crisis without diminishing its already scarce resources intended to support other critical economic and development strategies in education, public health, nutrition, energy access, and job creation

***